subscript op and function call op

I cannot get this to compile: problems with the operators

class FOO {

         public:
             int operator () (void) {
                  return(1);
             }
             int operator [] (unsigned index) {
                  return(array[index]);
             }            

       private:
             int array[10];
}

FOO *foo;

int main(void)  {
     
     foo = new FOO();
    int result = (some boolean expresion) ? foo[3] : 0;   // compiler does not foo[3] in this line
    int result2 = (some boolean expression) ? foo(3) : 0;   // compiler does not like foo(3) either

    delete foo;
    return 0;

}

Thanks.
I tried this in both watcom c/c++ 10.0b and borland 5.02 c++
migueAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

nietodCommented:
answer coming.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
nietodCommented:
Your Foo[3] is close, the only problem is that Foo is not a FOO object, it is a pointer to a FOO object.  If you declared it as a FOO, like

FOO Foo;

Then

int i = Foo[3];

would work.

You can fix this by declaring Foo as a FOO as shown above or by making it a reference, like

FOO &Foo = new FOO;

(Kind of unusual, but works.)  Or you can continue to keep Foo a pointer to FOO and change your syntax with the [] operator, like

FOO *Foo;
int i = (*Foo)[3];

Obviously, your attempt to use parenthesis (that is, Foo(3)) has the same problem as well as the fact that the parenthesis operator does not accept an integer parameter.  Thus you could change Foo to an object or a reference to an object and then you could do Foo().  Or you can keep it a pointer and do (*Foo)().
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
C++

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.