• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 220
  • Last Modified:

Template array class stuff

I have this template array class decl:

// Base template 1D      
template <class Type, int low, int high,int D> class A1D
{
  public:
       
   A1D(void): element(new Type[high-low+1]) { }
   ~A1D() { delete [] element; }

   Type& operator[](const int i) {
          if(i<low || i>high) {
            //throw(RangeException(D,low,high,i));
              cout << "Array out of range error !!" << endl;
              //return((Type&)0);
          }
        return element[i-low];
   }

   operator Type*() {
          return(element);
   }
           
   inline int begin() const {return low;}
   inline int end()   const {return high;}
   inline int dim()   const {return D;}
       
  private:
   //Type *element[high-low+1];
   Type *element;
};

// 2D      
template <class Type, int L1, int H1, int L2, int H2,int D>
class A2D : public A1D<A1D<Type,L2,H2,1>,L1,H1,D>
{
       
};

// 3D      
template <class Type, int L1, int H1, int L2, int H2, int L3, int H3, int D>
class A3D : public A1D<A2D<Type,L2,H2,L3,H3,2>,L1,H1,D>
{
     
};

In a program I declare the following:

A3D<int,0,5,0,5,0,5,3> arr;    // NOTE:  ( I know what you are thinking, but my compiler cannot handle default                                                   //                 template args..)


i also a have:

void foo(int a[][5][5])

I want to pass arr to foo, but the compiler complains of a type mismatch.


0
migue
Asked:
migue
  • 4
  • 3
1 Solution
 
nietodCommented:
That's not suprising.

arr is a class.  It is a class that acts like an array, but it is a class.
foo takes an array.  

The two are not the same.
0
 
nietodCommented:
You could declare foo to take a A3D<int,0,5,0,5,0,5,3>  like

void foo(A3D<int,0,5,0,5,0,5,3> a)
0
 
migueAuthor Commented:
nietod: I know the two are not the same. But can i code an operator for the class to take care of this problem ?
0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 
nietodCommented:
an operator to do what?  A conversion operator?  You can't realistically make a conversion operator because your class stores the data in the wrong format.  You could dynamically allocate memory of the right format and fill it it, but then you would have a memory leak.  You could use a proxy class to take care of the memory deletion, but then your conversion wouldn't work automatically.  So you would be forced to use an ugly syntax and it would be very innefficient.

I wouldn't recommend it.  I suggest you look into alternatives.  What is it that you are hoping to accomplish?

Or am I missunderstanding what you meant about an opperator?
0
 
migueAuthor Commented:
What I am trying to accomplish is that I want the template array class to behave as much as possible to regular 'C' arrays. If I cannot pass it to a function expecting a n-dimensional array of the same type(int,char,double...) then I am out of luck.

I have tested this class...it has no memory leaks that I know.
0
 
nietodCommented:
It has no memory leaks at the moment.  But you would have a hard time writing a conversion operator that didn't have a memory leak.

I think you are out of luck.

Your options are...

1.  write fuctions that take  the class instead of the c array.
2.  write a fucntion to create a c-array from the class.  But you will have cleanup issues.
3.  redesign your class to be memory compatible with c arrays--this is a big change with some serious dissadvantages, but also some major advantages.  You will get great flexibilty at the price of many compile time error checks.  

Opption 1 is probably the best.
0
 
abesoftCommented:
First, you will have trouble because one array is [][5][5] and the other is [][6][6].  However, if you change the requirement so that you want ot pass to a [][6][6] then here is one solution.

(This uses a class that uses c-compatable arrays as the underlying storage.  I agree with nietod that this is the only reasonable approach....)

#include <iostream.h>

// Base template 1D        
template <class Type, int l1, int h1, int l2, int h2, int l3, int h3, int D> class A3D
{
  public:
     
      typedef Type t_array [h1-l1+1][h2-l2+1][h3-l3+1];

   A3D(void) { }
   ~A3D() { }

   struct A1D {
       A3D<Type,l1,h1,l2,h2,l3,h3,D> &owner;
       int index, subIndex;
       A1D( A3D<Type,l1,h1,l2,h2,l3,h3,D> &o, int i, int s):
               owner( o), index(i), subIndex( s)
       {}
       Type &operator[]( int subSubIndex)
       {   return owner.get( index, subIndex, subSubIndex);}
   };

   struct A2D {
       A3D<Type,l1,h1,l2,h2,l3,h3,D> &owner;
       int index;
       A2D( A3D<Type,l1,h1,l2,h2,l3,h3,D> &o, int i): owner( o), index(i)
       {}
       A1D operator[]( int subIndex)
       {   return A1D( owner, index, subIndex);}
   };

   A2D operator[](const int i) {
        return A2D( *this, i);
   }
   
   int &get( int i1, int i2, int i3)
   {
       if ((i1 < l1) || (i1 > h1) || (i2 < l2) || (i2 > h2) || (i3 < l3) || (i3 > h3))
           cerr << "Ack!" << endl;
       return element[i1-l1][i2-l2][i3-l3];
   }


   operator t_array&() {return element;}
           
   inline int begin() const {return low;}
   inline int end()   const {return high;}
   inline int dim()   const {return D;}
       
  private:
   t_array element;
};

void foo(int a[][6][6])
{
}


void main()
{
  A3D<int,0,5,0,5,0,5,3> arr;

  arr[1][1][1] = 5;
 
  foo(arr);
}
Note that the class should also be extended to be const-correct, and probably exceptions should be used to handle the error (which this code will actually flame on...) I guess these are excercises for the reader ;)

Hope this helps!
0
 
migueAuthor Commented:
thanks guys..I guess I took the wrong design approach.
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

  • 4
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now