Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 206
  • Last Modified:

Synchronization between applications

I have a DLL which is being used by 2 applications. I want to synchronize the accesing of the DLL using a mutex. I
I used a CMutex object and used CSingleLock to lock and unlock the resource(DLL). It is working in the same apllication. But across applications the DLL is not getting locked. I want to know what is the reason and solution for this. Kindly help me. Is it not possible thro mutexes? Can I know that process of putting the applications in OLE out-of-process server and Yonat suggested to me?
Chensu: I have given the object name for the mutex.
The code construct is as follows:
CMutex mutObj; //in global scope
//inside my resource
CSingleLock singleLock(&mutObj);
singleLock.Lock();
{
;;;;
}
singleLock.Unlock();
The exclusion is taking place within the appln but not across the applns.

0
aac
Asked:
aac
  • 4
  • 3
1 Solution
 
yonatCommented:
I think that each application loads a seperate instance of the DLL into it's own process space.

To have the same objects shared by to processes (applications), you will need to put them in an OLE out-of-process server.
0
 
aacAuthor Commented:
Edited text of question
0
 
aacAuthor Commented:
Edited text of question
0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 
chensuCommented:
I think the CMutex object can be used across process boundaries. But you must specify the name of the CMutex object. Do you specify a name when you construct the object?
0
 
aacAuthor Commented:
Edited text of question
0
 
chensuCommented:
No, you haven't given a name for the mutex. It is not the C++ object name. Use the following code.

CMutex mutObj(FALSE, _T("MyMutex"));

mutObj will reference the mutex "MyMutex". If you don't give it a name, it will create a new mutex, in which case you have two seperated mutex objects created in two processes.
0
 
aacAuthor Commented:
Chensu's answer worked out!!! Hats off to Chensu. Thank U very much for prompt answers.
0
 
chensuCommented:
So, why did you reject my answer instead of giving me A? :-(
0

Featured Post

Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

  • 4
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now