Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

Inheritance Problem ][

Posted on 1998-06-13
6
Medium Priority
?
221 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-14
Ok, so maybe I do not know C++ as well as I thought I did...
I have code which resembles the following:

class Base // Abstract Class
{
public:
  unsigned long ulSize;

 Base(void):ulSize(0) {}
  //virtual functions...
};

class X:public Base
{
public:
  X(void):ulSize(sizeof(X)) {}
 // a bunch of new data members, overridden functions...
};  

class Y:public Base
{
public:
  Y(void):ulSize(sizeof(Y)) {}
 // a bunch of OTHER new data members, overridden functions...
};

I need to implement a function foo which will take an array of Base "objects" (obviously, the array will actually contain X, Y or some other derived objects), and the number of items in the array, and perform various operations on the array. So far, what I have come up with is the following:

class Array
{
public:
  Base *ptr;
  int count;
  unsigned long ulSize;

  Array(Base *aptr, int acount):ptr(aptr),count(acount)
  {
    ulSize = ptr[0].ulSize;
    assert(ulSize > 0);
  }

  Base &operator[](int index)
  {
    return *( (Base *)( (char *)ptr + ulSize*index) );
  }
};

I don't like this solution because it requires memory allocation/deallocation outside the Array class (since the class can't know what type to allocate). Is there a better solution ? I would like to stay away from linked lists, since my arrays will never exceed 1k, anyway...
0
Comment
Question by:Sinclair
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 22

Accepted Solution

by:
nietod earned 200 total points
ID: 1165817
answer coming.
0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:nietod
ID: 1165818
Your best bet is to make the array store and array of pointer to Base objects rather than store the objects directly.  

Advantages:  
You don't need to store the size of each object inside each object.  (There were ways around that with your current design, if you're interested).
The array could be used to store a mix of derived class objects, that is, some X's and some Y's.
The array could be implimented using one of the STL classes (or just simply be one of the sTL classes).
The array could be made to do a lot more manipulation without help from the caller.  For example, it could add new entries (with NULL pointers, or with pointers to default created objects.)

0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:Sinclair
ID: 1165819
Thanks, nietod ! I like this array thing, even though I would have to modify quite a lot of stuff... Out of curiosity, what was that other solution you mentioned ?
0
VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:nietod
ID: 1165820
Note the fact that the array that is internal to the Array class stored pointers rather than objects can be totally hidden from the Array class's clients.  The way that the Array class is implimneted is of no concern to the classes that use the array class.
0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:nietod
ID: 1165821
Not another solution.  Another way to handle your current approach.  You could use a virutal function inside each class that returns the the class's size.  That would be a lot more memory efficient than storing the size of each object in the object.  

I tried approaches like this in the past and always found them lacking.   They can be made to work, but had too many annoying problems.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:Sinclair
ID: 1165822
Thanks again, I will go convert my program now :-)
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Article by: SunnyDark
This article's goal is to present you with an easy to use XML wrapper for C++ and also present some interesting techniques that you might use with MS C++. The reason I built this class is to ease the pain of using XML files with C++, since there is…
What is C++ STL?: STL stands for Standard Template Library and is a part of standard C++ libraries. It contains many useful data structures (containers) and algorithms, which can spare you a lot of the time. Today we will look at the STL Vector. …
The viewer will learn how to use and create new code templates in NetBeans IDE 8.0 for Windows.
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.

705 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question