?
Solved

disable/visible a node in tree view

Posted on 1998-06-15
5
Medium Priority
?
610 Views
Last Modified: 2006-11-17
hi,
i m trying to disable ( or to change to visiable =false)
one node in a tree view.

there is no disable propery for nodes and the visiable property is read only in runtime.

is there any way to do it without removeing all the nodes (with tree.remove methode) and adding them from again without that one node.

tnx,
eyaltil.
0
Comment
Question by:eyaltil
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
5 Comments
 

Expert Comment

by:cerik
ID: 1463356
The simple solution is to use the something like the Sheridan Active treeview control, as this has an enabled property on a node object. The only thing to watch is the Expand event, since though the node is disabled it can still be expanded, thus you need to test or set expanded property to false in the Expand event.

Active treeview is at www.sheridan.com, and costs a bit (US$195) but has some neat stuff

Otherwise, you could try set the nodes tag property and test the tag at each node event like, not super elegant, but it does work:
 
TreeView1.Nodes(3).Tag = "1"

Private Sub TreeView1_Expand(ByVal Node As ComctlLib.Node)
If Node.Tag = "1" Then Node.Expanded = False
End Sub

and

Private Sub TreeView1_NodeClick(ByVal Node As ComctlLib.Node)
If Node.Tag = "1" Then Exit Sub
End Sub

etc....
0
 
LVL 9

Accepted Solution

by:
cymbolic earned 360 total points
ID: 1463357
You are correct in assuming that you would have to delete then add back treeview items to make them dissappear and reappear using the Microsoft supplied Treeview.  Of course this may present other problems, since the control will redraw to present the new picture.  I would say a better way would be to change the icon for the node, so that your user could visibly see that the node was no longer enabled.  That way you can use the icon property to intercept events for disabled nodes, and your user will get a clue that the other similar "iconed" nodes are disabled as well.

It's useless to attempt to make this control do something outside of its programmed methods.  You'll just waste a lot of time to no purpose.  There are however a number of third party treeview controls out there.  The problem is that in all I've looked at, once you've written your code to the MS treeview control, its a rewrite to use any other treeview.  Also, its a major effort to learn any of them, since the controls are so complex, tricky, and with so many properties and methods.

I have not personally been very pleased with the Sheridan controls.  They have seemed to me to be excessively buggy, and don't seem to make the trip between VB versions very well.

If contemplating a replacement treeview, look at www.vbxtras.com.  Be prepared to find that they are all nasty beasts to work with, particularly if you want to make them work outside of their native programmed methods.  Its enough effort to get any one of them working well, that you need to find one that is acceptable (MS's will do) and find ways around their limitations and work within the available methods.
0
 

Author Comment

by:eyaltil
ID: 1463358
does he has the visible propery too?

does it avaliable in run time (the reguler control has this propery but it read only in run time)
0
 

Expert Comment

by:cerik
ID: 1463359
No the Sheridan one has the same visible property as the MS treeview, and seems to work the same way.

As to cymbolic's answer.

Yes the sheridan controls were buggy and no they do not like moveing from VB 4 to VB 5, but then again there were quiet a few problems with that move from a couple of 3rd party OCX's (I won't even mention Microsoft). But we have been working with the treeview for a while, and it does not seem to bad, especialy if you update with the bug patchs from Sheridan,( the ActiveToolbar is also quite nice, but I cannot comment on its stability yet.)


 
0
 

Expert Comment

by:cerik
ID: 1463360
Just one other thing, cymbolic is correct in that if you have MS treeview heavily intergrated then, it would be better to try a work around.

 I also I fooled around with a hidden treeview to store the node and subnodes so that you can easily replace them back into the main treeview later, so this may be another way to go if you have a big complex sub structure under the node you wish to hide.

 
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Introduction While answering a recent question about filtering a custom class collection, I realized that this could be accomplished with very little code by using the ScriptControl (SC) library.  This article will introduce you to the SC library a…
I was working on a PowerPoint add-in the other day and a client asked me "can you implement a feature which processes a chart when it's pasted into a slide from another deck?". It got me wondering how to hook into built-in ribbon events in Office.
As developers, we are not limited to the functions provided by the VBA language. In addition, we can call the functions that are part of the Windows operating system. These functions are part of the Windows API (Application Programming Interface). U…
Get people started with the process of using Access VBA to control Outlook using automation, Microsoft Access can control other applications. An example is the ability to programmatically talk to Microsoft Outlook. Using automation, an Access applic…
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month15 days, 7 hours left to enroll

743 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question