Solved

muldiv64 on small cpu's

Posted on 1998-06-24
7
375 Views
Last Modified: 2008-02-01
Hi.

I have a small problem.

I need to calculate  x =  (a*b)/c.

Problem is, that a,b and c are 32 bit long, and the machine doesn't have a 64/32 bit division. The code the compiler generates in this case is ugly and slow (yep, it's time-critical). Does anyone has an idea how to do a fast version with 2 or maybe 4 ordinary 32/32 divisions?

Thank you in advance,

 Nils Pipenbrinck

(P.S. Please don't quote ugly c-code from the gnu lib)
0
Comment
Question by:nils pipenbrinck
7 Comments
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:sganta
ID: 1251396
Hello !

You use
x = (a/c)*b;    /* Instead of x = (a*b)/c; */

0
 
LVL 11

Expert Comment

by:alexo
ID: 1251397
>> x = (a/c)*b;
Which will give you an incorrect result due to premature rounding
0
 
LVL 4

Author Comment

by:nils pipenbrinck
ID: 1251398
sganter, as alexo already said.. this will give incorrect results.

nils
0
Netscaler Common Configuration How To guides

If you use NetScaler you will want to see these guides. The NetScaler How To Guides show administrators how to get NetScaler up and configured by providing instructions for common scenarios and some not so common ones.

 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:sganta
ID: 1251399
Hello !
x = (a/c)*b;    /* Instead of x = (a*b)/c; */
is correct because
First it will get the result for a/c since it is in the paranthesis.
i.e., 32bit/32 bit division, result will be 32 bit only

Then it will take the result and multiply with b.

The equivalent statement in the assembly language is like this
MOVE value_of_a to AX
DIV AX,value_of_c /* AX contains the RESULT of A/C */
MUL AX,value_of_b /*AX  contains the FINAL RESULT  */

You test this program. Here it works. If it does'nt work, I don't mind.
You can reject my answer
0
 
LVL 84

Expert Comment

by:ozo
ID: 1251400
(a/c)*(b/c)*c+a/c*(b%c)+b/c*(a%c)+(a%c)*(b%c)/c
0
 
LVL 4

Author Comment

by:nils pipenbrinck
ID: 1251401
x = (a/c)*b;    /* Instead of x = (a*b)/c; */

 a = 1
 b = 1000
 c = 2

 x = (a/c)*b would give:

  (1/2) * 1000
  = 0 * 1000
  = 0

while my formula gives:

 x = (a*b)/c

 (1*1000)/2 = 500

your substitution won't give the correct results in this case.
anyways  we  found a fast way to solve this problem.

Thank you.

(just answer again, I reopend the question for 50 points. then 'll give you the 50 points for your work.)
0
 
LVL 4

Accepted Solution

by:
sganta earned 100 total points
ID: 1251402
I am sorry, I will apreciate it.
0

Featured Post

Microsoft Certification Exam 74-409

Veeam® is happy to provide the Microsoft community with a study guide prepared by MVP and MCT, Orin Thomas. This guide will take you through each of the exam objectives, helping you to prepare for and pass the examination.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

An Outlet in Cocoa is a persistent reference to a GUI control; it connects a property (a variable) to a control.  For example, it is common to create an Outlet for the text field GUI control and change the text that appears in this field via that Ou…
Examines three attack vectors, specifically, the different types of malware used in malicious attacks, web application attacks, and finally, network based attacks.  Concludes by examining the means of securing and protecting critical systems and inf…
Video by: Grant
The goal of this video is to provide viewers with basic examples to understand and use nested-loops in the C programming language.
The goal of this video is to provide viewers with basic examples to understand how to create, access, and change arrays in the C programming language.

830 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question