Solved

nested templates

Posted on 1998-10-08
8
229 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-01
#include<iostream.h>

template<class T> class Array {

      public:

        // used for throwing exceptions of this type
        class range{};

        Array(): data(0), sz(0) {}
        Array(unsigned size): sz(size), data(new T[size]) {}
        ~Array() { delete [] data;}

        const T& operator[](unsigned n) const {
            if(n >= sz || data == 0) {
                  //throw range();
                  //return((T&)0);
            }
            return(data[n]);
        }

        T& operator[](unsigned n) {
          if(n >= sz || data == 0) {
                //throw range();
                  //return((T&)0);
            }
            return(data[n]);
        }

        operator const T*() const {
          return(data);
        }

        operator T*() {
          return(data);
        }

      unsigned Top(void) const {
          return(sz);
        }

  private:
        T* data;
        unsigned sz;
        Array(const Array& a);
        Array& operator=(const Array&);
};

void main(void)
{
   Array< Array<int> > foo(2);

   cout << foo[0][0] << endl;

}
------------------------------------
Code compiles, but prog. gives access violation. I stepped thru with debugger. Default ctor is used, so no memory is init. I want to use this template for n dimentional arrays.
0
Comment
Question by:migue
  • 6
  • 2
8 Comments
 
LVL 22

Accepted Solution

by:
nietod earned 100 total points
ID: 1174661
It would be throwing an exception, but you dissabled that.  Why?
0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:nietod
ID: 1174662
The line

  Array< Array<int> > foo(2);

constructs 3 arrays.  foo is constructed as an array that contains 2 arrays.  (since a size was specified to its constructor, the default constructor is not used.).  However, the two arrays inside of foo's array are default constructed.  (When the Array class creates its array, it uses the default constructor on T, in this case when foo creates its array, it is used the default constrcutor of Array<int>.)  Thus Foo has two entries, but those entries have no entries, this the code

foo[0]

is fine, it returns an Array<int> with no entries, but

foo[0][0]

is not because it tries to access an entry in the empty array.

I hope this helps, let me know if you have questions.
0
 

Author Comment

by:migue
ID: 1174663
good explanation nietod, but I still need to do "foo[0][0]" . HOW do I feed the empty array?
I want to be able to access foo[][][][].....n dimensions.


0
ScreenConnect 6.0 Free Trial

Check out the updates in one game-changing release, ScreenConnect 6.0, based on partner feedback. New features include a redesigned UI that improves session organization and overall user experience. See the enhancements for yourself!

 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:nietod
ID: 1174664
First you need to size the inner arrays, you could add a SetSize() member, then do

 Array< Array<int> > foo(2);

foo[0].SetSize(2);
foo[1].SetSize(2);

Then you could do

foo[0][0]

That doesn't seem very convenient however. and you could have problems where some of the inner arrays are not sized to the same dimensions as the others.  But that is probably  the best you can do with this sort of design.

0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:nietod
ID: 1174665
Does that help?  I can think of another approach where you don;t have to worrk about having the inner arrays sized, but ir requires adding a 2nd type of array class ans at least one other support class.  It makes things a bit more complex, but more automatic too.  I could elaborate.
0
 

Author Comment

by:migue
ID: 1174666
Nietod: thanks for help, please email your othe proposed design solution. I added another 20 points.
0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:nietod
ID: 1174667
Some advice, in the future, don't accept answers until you have a working solution you are compfortable with.

Fist of all you will need two array template classes.  One class will be used as the innermost array.  It doesn't make any assumptions about the data it stores.  The second class is used for all the outer arrays.  It assumes the classes it stores is an array (either of the two array classes), and therefore it can assume certain members are present.  This will allow it to set the size of the inner class.  Make sense?
0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:nietod
ID: 1174668
Now with this technique, you could set all the arrays to the same size, easily, like you could construct a [100][100][100] array by passing 100 to the outer array's constructor and it would pass it on to the next and the next.  However, you cannot do an array like [100][10][20], there is no way to pass the various values. The outer array's constructor must take a specific number of parameters.  But there is a way to make this work, if you need it.  It involves adding yet another class.  (You can start on the others in the meantime, this can be added later, if you want it.)
0

Featured Post

Optimizing Cloud Backup for Low Bandwidth

With cloud storage prices going down a growing number of SMBs start to use it for backup storage. Unfortunately, business data volume rarely fits the average Internet speed. This article provides an overview of main Internet speed challenges and reveals backup best practices.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In days of old, returning something by value from a function in C++ was necessarily avoided because it would, invariably, involve one or even two copies of the object being created and potentially costly calls to a copy-constructor and destructor. A…
Templates For Beginners Or How To Encourage The Compiler To Work For You Introduction This tutorial is targeted at the reader who is, perhaps, familiar with the basics of C++ but would prefer a little slower introduction to the more ad…
The viewer will learn how to clear a vector as well as how to detect empty vectors in C++.
The viewer will be introduced to the technique of using vectors in C++. The video will cover how to define a vector, store values in the vector and retrieve data from the values stored in the vector.

773 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question