Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people, just like you, are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
Solved

About CCriticalSection

Posted on 1998-11-18
2
194 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-20
Hi!
I have some threads, which can call a function from a single
object, let's say CBoss.
 When I declare a CCriticalSection class in the header of
CBoos (       CCriticalSection m_readSection;)
and I try to access the function of this class from a thread-class in the next way:

CSingleLock m_readSection(&m_pDoc->m_readSection, FALSE);
m_readSection.Lock(INFINITE);
m_pDoc->ReadMsg(pMsg, this);
m_readSection.Unlock();

the thread stops on the second Lock (i.e. when I try to lock the second time the CriticalSection, the thread begin to wait, even if the CSingleLock object - m_readSection is
not locked- I have checked this). There is only one thread,
so doesn't exist another thread to lock this critical section.

When I use in the CBoss header       

static CRITICAL_SECTION m_readSect;
and I try to access the function of this class from a thread class in the next way:
EnterCriticalSection(&m_pDoc->m_readSect);
{
      m_pDoc->ReadMsg(pMsg, this);
}
LeaveCriticalSection(&m_pDoc->m_readSect);

it's OK.

What's wrong with the use of MFC classes?





0
Comment
Question by:visualc
2 Comments
 
LVL 15

Accepted Solution

by:
Tommy Hui earned 50 total points
ID: 1324929
The problem is you are passing the critical section by value. Generally this makes a copy and most MFC classes do not have copy semantics. You should pass the critical section by reference (CCriticalSection&) or by pointer (CCriticalSection*).
0
 

Author Comment

by:visualc
ID: 1324930
Hi,
I think that is another problem, because if I modify the declaration of m_readSection to
CCriticalSection* m_readSection;
and I use in this way -->
CSingleLock m_readSection(m_pDoc->m_readSection, FALSE);
if (m_readSection.IsLocked())
    MessageBeeP(1000);
m_readSection.Lock(INFINITE);
m_pDoc->ReadMsg(pMsg, this);
m_readSection.Unlock();

the problem is the same. When I try the second time, the code doesn't reach the MessageBeep command, so the CriticalSection is unlocked, but when I try to lock, the thread stops.
I don't have any idea, why.
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Path Explorer

An intuitive utility to help find the CSS path to UI elements on a webpage. These paths are used frequently in a variety of front-end development and QA automation tasks.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Introduction: Displaying information on the statusbar.   Continuing from the third article about sudoku.   Open the project in visual studio. Status bar – let’s display the timestamp there.  We need to get the timestamp from the document s…
Introduction: Dialogs (1) modal - maintaining the database. Continuing from the ninth article about sudoku.   You might have heard of modal and modeless dialogs.  Here with this Sudoku application will we use one of each type: a modal dialog …
This video will show you how to get GIT to work in Eclipse.   It will walk you through how to install the EGit plugin in eclipse and how to checkout an existing repository.

792 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question