Solved

#pragma data_seg("shared") and threads?

Posted on 1999-01-21
3
990 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-20
In 16-bit land data in a dll could be shared. In 32-bit land the data can still be shared but must be declared in a #pragma data_seg compiler directive.

If I do this is there a new problem of the data being accessed across different thread boundaries? In which case do I have to place a critical section around access to all the shared data?
0
Comment
Question by:sdj_work
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 4

Accepted Solution

by:
piano_boxer earned 50 total points
ID: 1328099
As with any static variable(s) in your code, you have to protect it if it is accessed from multiple threads at the same time, and one or more threads of them are modifying the variable(s).

In your case you also have to use a named mutex (or simular) that can be accessed from all the processes the uses the DLL.

There is one problem with shared data segment in DLL. When another process loads the DLL and Windows loads it at another address because of a conflict with a another DLL, it will *not* get the same shared data as the other processes using your DLL. You can almost solve the problem by specifying the load address for the DLL, but your will not be 100% sure.

I suggest that you use memory mapped files ( without the file ) protected by a named mutex.

Here is how to initialize the mutex and shared memory mapped file:

...............

// Your own data structure goes here!
struct MY_DATA_STRUCT
{
    DWORD dwSomeValue;
    char  szSomeText[1024];
};

//
// Unique names of objects
//
LPCTSTR pszMutexName = "MyApp_Mutex";
LPCTSTR pszMapName = "MyApp_MemMap";

//
// Open the mutex and lock it.
//
BOOL bNew = TRUE;
HANDLE hMutex = CreateMutex(NULL, TRUE, pszMutexName);
if(GetLastError() == ERROR_ALREADY_EXISTS)
    bNew = FALSE;

//
// Create the memory mapped file for holding the
// MY_DATA_STRUCT structure.
//
HANDLE hFileMap = CreateFileMapping((HANDLE)0xffffffff, NULL,      PAGE_READWRITE | SEC_COMMIT, 0, sizeof(MY_DATA_STRUCT),pszMapName);

MY_DATA_STRUCT* pMyData = (MY_DATA_STRUCT*)MapViewOfFile(hFileMap, FILE_MAP_ALL_ACCESS, 0, 0, 0);

//
// Zero out the memory if it did not exists all-ready.
//
if(bNew)
    ZeroMemory(pMyData, sizeof(MY_DAtA_STRUCT));

//
// Release lock on shared memory
//
ReleaseMutex(hMutex);

////////////////////////////////////////////
// ACCESSING DATA
////////////////////////////////////////////

// Gain exclusive access to the data
WaitForSingleObject(hMutex, INFINITE);

// Modify/read data frim the structure now.
pMyData->dwSomeValue += GetTickCount();

// Release the lock on the memory.
ReleaseMutex(hMutex);


////////////////////////////////////////////
// CLEANUP CODE:
////////////////////////////////////////////
UnmapViewOfFile(pMyData);
CloseHandle(hFileMap);
CloseHandle(hMutex);
0
 

Author Comment

by:sdj_work
ID: 1328100
Is this point about the DLL process not getting the same shared area not covered by KB article: Q100634. In which case pointers would not actually work correctly but the data *is* still shared correctly?

Otherwise there would be no point in implementing the feature.
0
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:piano_boxer
ID: 1328101
This is from Q100634:

"if the block cannot be loaded into the same memory address, it is mapped to a different address, but it is still shared.".

So I guess I'm wrong about data not beeing shared when dll's are relocated, but I would still use the memmory mapped file method.
0

Featured Post

Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Generic progress indicator 6 113
Change owner from userA to server Local Administrators 7 59
either24  challenge 19 90
Can not remove SSL certificate on iPhone 6 - iOS10.2 12 259
In this article, I'll describe -- and show pictures of -- some of the significant additions that have been made available to programmers in the MFC Feature Pack for Visual C++ 2008.  These same feature are in the MFC libraries that come with Visual …
If you use Adobe Reader X it is possible you can't open OLE PDF documents in the standard. The reason is the 'save box mode' in adobe reader X. Many people think the protected Mode of adobe reader x is only to stop the write access. But this fe…
This video will show you how to get GIT to work in Eclipse.   It will walk you through how to install the EGit plugin in eclipse and how to checkout an existing repository.
Internet Business Fax to Email Made Easy - With  eFax Corporate (http://www.enterprise.efax.com), you'll receive a dedicated online fax number, which is used the same way as a typical analog fax number. You'll receive secure faxes in your email, f…

910 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

21 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now