Problems with threads.

Hello!
I have a multithreaded Client/Server. When clients are beginning to connect to this, the of all OS begins to work slow (immediately when I start new threads, the system works visible slower - after only two threads!!). The priority of threads is normal. The C-S communication is done through TCP/IP, using handles to CAsyncSocket derived classes, using WinSock API.
What is the problem??
Here is the looping code of the threads, which communicate with clients:

while (WaitForSingleObject(m_hEventKill, 0) == WAIT_TIMEOUT)
      {
            i =  recv( m_hSocket, b, 2, 0);
            if (i == 2)
            {
                    Do something.....
            }
            if (i == SOCKET_ERROR )
            {
                  switch (WSAGetLastError())
                  {
                  case WSAETIMEDOUT :
                  case WSAECONNRESET :
                  case WSAECONNABORTED :
                        {
                              m_theMessage = "@@##$$conerr";
                              ProcessPendingRead();
                              WaitForSingleObject(m_hEventKill, INFINITE);
                        }
                  }
            }
      };
tmolnarAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
piano_boxerConnect With a Mentor Commented:
You are doing a BUSY wait because the timeout value for WaitForSingleObject is zero.

You can switch to using CAsyncSocket class the handles incomming data async. Derive your own class from CAsyncSocket and override OnReceive() and OnClose() functions.

OnReceive() will be called when there are some data ready to be read, and OnClose() will be called when the socket is closed.

You can add the derived CAsyncSocket class as a variable in you CWinApp and initialize it in OnInitInstance():

OnInitInstance(...)
{
   [...]
   m_MySocket.Create(12345, SOCK_STREAM, FD_READ|FD_CLOSE);
   [...]
}


Another solution is to use Winsock2 and use the WSAEventSelect function to enable signalling of a Win32 event when something happens on the socket.
0
 
tmolnarAuthor Commented:
Edited text of question
0
 
tmolnarAuthor Commented:
If I do that, I have to cut out the will the
while (WaitForSingleObject(m_hEventKill, 0) == WAIT_TIMEOUT)
{
  ...
}
to avoid the busy wait...
But how to know, that the main thread want to kill the thread?
(see the m_hEventKill event)
Anoher question: the OnReceive() function will be called by the system, and will be work in the main thread on in the "client" thread?
Another problem is, that when I try to read in nonblocking mode all the time, I got an error, when the connection failed. How to get a corresponding error notification, if I use a CAsyncSocket derived class (something like On Error())?
0
Free Tool: Site Down Detector

Helpful to verify reports of your own downtime, or to double check a downed website you are trying to access.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

 
piano_boxerCommented:
I just re-read the question and there is really no need for you to use the thread function if you use the CAsyncSocket class.

Just drop the thread-thing for now.

The CAsyncSocket::OnReceive() function is call in the context of the thread that created the socket and is called by MFC through an internal hidden window MFC creates in CAsyncSocket::Create(). Windows posts socket event messages to this hidden windows and MFC calls the OnXxxx messages in response to them.

To read data from the socket do something like this in your OnReceive() overriden function:

void CMySocket::OnReceive(int nErrorCode)
{
    BYTE buf[512];
    CString strFromAddr;
    UINT nFromPort;

    int len = ReceiveFrom(buf, sizeof(buf), strFromAddr, nFromPort);
    if(len==0)
        // Connection closed !!!
    if(len>0)
    {
        // Use data in the buffer (buf).
    }
}

Here you also get the IP address and port of the sender. If you dont want this, just use the Receive() call instead.

Look at the nErrorCode passed to OnReceive() for errors.
0
 
tmolnarAuthor Commented:
Thax!! It's OK now...
0
 
tmolnarAuthor Commented:
Thanx!! It's OK now...
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.