it just happend that a 900 points question has been answered with code written by me and accepted without even considering to give me credit (despite that my name appeared).
It was not only I high point question but it also was about a very difficult problem (COM, shell extensions) which needs true expertise and is hard to explain..
So I ask you what you think about this.
I agree that the fastest correct answer should get the points in cases where it comes to common code like string replacements or file search. Also links to such code are acceptable. But what about really difficult code? Alex, Madshi, how often is your code used by other guys to answer a question (e.g. Alex's HowTos and Madshi's CreateProcess stuff)? I don't answer questions which would require to copy someone else's code (e.g. MAPI) as I don't know much about it. How should we handle this? Should we at all differentiate or do you mean to let it go as it went until now?