Direct Cable Connection-W98

Why does the guest computer say "cannot connect to host computer?"

I am using "Direct Cable Connection" in Windows 95 on the host PC, and Windows 98 on the guest PC.  The cable is connected between the two.  It is a 25-pin, connected to the printer port on each PC, which I understand is a parallel LPT-1 port.  Normally, a printer is connected to those ports.

I have tried re-booting both PC's.  I am assuming the cable is good.  I have not used this cable for several months, however.  Would there be IRQ conflicts?

Do you need additional information to answer my question?

Thanks.    -Kimball Cummings, Jr.
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Why are you using the printer port? Normally when this is done it is done with a serial (COM) port. Maybe you can do it like this but I've never heard of it.
As far as the question about the IRQ conflict, if you can print to a printer on each machine, you would have already had to take care of any IRQ conflicts. Putting a cable between two machines doesn't cause any changes to IRQs.
As far as I know, the Direct Cable Connection only works through the COM ports with a null modem cable. If you have
1) Selected the correct port on both computers

2) Made sure you are running the Direct Cable Connection program on both computers and have one set to Host and one set to Client

and 3) Made sure the ports are configured to use Direct Cable Connection

you're stuck. I have had no luck using DCC in the past. If you want to do anything really serious, I reccommend investing in LapLink for Windows.
Also remeber, that the serial link only works with IPX protocol
MSSPs - Are you paying too much?

WEBINAR: Managed security service providers often deploy & manage products from a variety of solution vendors. But is this really the best approach when it comes to saving time AND money? Join us on Aug. 15th to learn how you can improve your total cost of ownership today!

Parallel connection can be used. It is recommended, since it can give you 300kbps, as opposed to 115kbps from the serial link.
 I'd check that cable - that it is functional and that it allows bi-directional communication.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Ooh, good one Nenadic. The BIOS may have to be set do Bi-directional parallel port mode. I forgot about that. Speaking of speed, isn't there a new connection out now that uses the USB ports? That would be a good one to look into if you're using newer USB-enabled computers.

USB only works with windows 98 and not with windows 95.

Also keep in mind that you should enable file and print sharing on both computers (you can do this via the propertie panel of your network neighbourhood).

kimballcAuthor Commented:
Thanks everyone for your help.  I am so impressed by all the responses.  You guys all know more than I.  Nenadic hit it right, though.  I returned to the computer store and replaced the null modem cable with a "uni parallel DB25" cable.  Then Direct Cable Connection worked very well.  It was the cable that was the problem.
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.