ifconfig - bcast for 16bit netmask

On a RedHat 6.1 box ifconfig shows eth0 inet addr: Bcast: Mask: This is a large production network. The correct subnet is there is no other PC with a dup address. If I ping -b I will recieve a reply from my self only. If I ping -b I recieve replies from all over the subnet. Does if config show the correct broadcast address? Can you manually set the broadcast?
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

You can set the broadcast address...

probably the best way is to go into


and edit the appropriate lines...

alternatively, you can do a man ifconfig, and simply do it from the command line.
tdyllAuthor Commented:
Thanks for the infomation on where to make the change. I am going to break out the TCP/IP books tonight but I was interested in a conformation that the correct broadcast for ip address is

Well, it very much depends on what is defined as a "correct" address... The "classful" bcast address for a class A network is Your net, in effect, is using the 10.75 network (as opposed, e.g. to 10.34 network) and, therefore, the bcast of is possible (and, indeed, in use by the network).
Your Linux box seems to be somewhat misconfigured, vis-a-vis bcast. The correct ifconfig command would be:

      ifconfig ethX 10.75.20.YYY netmask broadcast

On a redhat machine, the answer given by helver above is correct - you can set the bcat address there.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
tdyllAuthor Commented:
Good answer, Thanks for helping me confirm the fix to my problem.

As for constructive critisizm. You may want to stick to plain english. I have no idea what you meant by "vis-a-vis" and english is my first language. Think of the guy outside the USA who may learn something from your comments.

If you want to bring up RFC guidelines for non-routing address classes you need to explain it completely. Just making reference to "Class A" addressing will only confuse the less experienced.  
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Linux Networking

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.