Windows 98 and more than 128mg of RAM

What is everyones opinion on Windows 98  with more than 128mg of ram?  It is my understanding that this does not scale well and that Windows 98 actually runs slower (my experience) with more than 128mg.
jdbrooksAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

j2Commented:
Depends a bit on your motherboard too, you shpould have more then 512kbyte cache to use >128Mbyte, personally i think 98 scales pretty good up to 256Mbyte.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Patricia Siu-Lai HoCommented:
<<What is everyones opinion on Windows 98>> Hi, still open for everyones!!!  
0
guedalCommented:
I am running 98 on a PII 350Mhz. with 192MB of RAM and since I upgraded from 95 y felt a considerable performance improvement. I am now to convert to FAT 32 and will see how performance behaves.
0
Cloud Class® Course: Microsoft Windows 7 Basic

This introductory course to Windows 7 environment will teach you about working with the Windows operating system. You will learn about basic functions including start menu; the desktop; managing files, folders, and libraries.

grater120898Commented:
It is entirely possible (and in some cases, recommended) if you run 98 with more than 128 megs, especially if you work on graphic/multimedia intensive apps like Photoshop or 3D accelerated games. Unless you do a lot of multitasking, though,
going more than 128 megs probably isn't necessary.

Personally, I think if certain features of Win 2000 were made accessible (or built into) for home users and other legacy users, then the rest of us will reap some real benefits. Multi-CPU/multi-monitor support, anyone? How about a solid DOS emulator? Upgrading RAM is a great and relatively inexpensive way to go, but not the only solution.

My $0.02

Alex
0
daddudeCommented:
Depends on the chipset on the mother board- not win98.  I think before PIIs the system would only cache 64 meg and anything more would actually degrade performance.  
0
j2Commented:
Thats a missconception (sort of)

While it is tru that pre-pentium-ii onöy the HX chipset would cache more then 64Mbyte, it would ONLY reduce performance on a system that never used swap even before the upgrade. Because the reduced swapping in most cases more then well made up for the lack of cache-speed.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Windows OS

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.