homersim
asked on
Netscape Frame Border
Hi,
If you go the the URL www.netpresence.co.uk/sterling, I cant seem to get the top frame to stick at a certain pixel height in Netscape (4.6). It should be stuck at 78 pixels, but as you can see it overlaps the text image in Netscape. This works fine in Explorer 5. Please help, thanks.
If you go the the URL www.netpresence.co.uk/sterling, I cant seem to get the top frame to stick at a certain pixel height in Netscape (4.6). It should be stuck at 78 pixels, but as you can see it overlaps the text image in Netscape. This works fine in Explorer 5. Please help, thanks.
Yes, like Xabi mentions, it's a NS bug, but you may solve it :
I see that you're using seperate pictures. The lefttop picture, which represents the top of the letters "Sterling" must be that way, that the top of the letters are gone. So "sterling_logo_bot.gif" must contain all the letters. This way it camouflages the bug. It's a possible solution, and I think the most suitable one. If someone else has another...well, I'm curious :)
Joseph
I see that you're using seperate pictures. The lefttop picture, which represents the top of the letters "Sterling" must be that way, that the top of the letters are gone. So "sterling_logo_bot.gif" must contain all the letters. This way it camouflages the bug. It's a possible solution, and I think the most suitable one. If someone else has another...well, I'm curious :)
Joseph
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Hehehe bad layout cause font family :)
Anyway I hope you can imagine what i was trying to draw :)
xabi
ps: Hi Joseph
Anyway I hope you can imagine what i was trying to draw :)
xabi
ps: Hi Joseph
this xabi guy is just like...everywhere i go...hi Xabi....
and hi Joseph...looks like You've got this under control allready...
and hi Joseph...looks like You've got this under control allready...
Yo Xabi and Maximillion!! Whazzup guys!
Well, seems like there are several solutions to this problem, homersim. Just try our comments and let us know ;)
Joseph
Well, seems like there are several solutions to this problem, homersim. Just try our comments and let us know ;)
Joseph
Hi DreamMaster d:)
xabi@everywhere.com
xabi@everywhere.com
david315@wxs.nl
or
max@thekitchen.nl
i don't think i deserve points here...i didn't do anything in this thread...
or
max@thekitchen.nl
i don't think i deserve points here...i didn't do anything in this thread...
Go and use layers!!!
the Netscape-problem with frames that need exact pixel sizes is a bug you can't escape from, regardless of whether you split the frames vertically or horisontally. in your case it looks the alternative layout suggested by xabi will fix the problem though, since the whole left part will be one frame.
the key is to design in such a way that you're not relying on frames having exact pixel sizes, because you will never get that.
the key is to design in such a way that you're not relying on frames having exact pixel sizes, because you will never get that.
ASKER
Thanks for all your help guys, splitting the frames like this seems to work ok. Cheers Xabi!
and again Xabi gets em...hurray for Xabi...
HURRAYYYY.....
and again Xabi gets em...hurray for Xabi...
xabi