Obtaining valid process handle for function

I have a small program I've written to demonstrate setting an exception filter. Problem is, in the call to SymGetSymFromAddr(), the HANDLE I pass to it must be bad, as this function fails, and then a call to GetLastError() returns '6', Invalid Handle. If I print out the handle beforehand, it is usually 88 (as in int).

Here is the primary code (I can submit more if required). These functions are called in the exception filter that gets called on an exception.

DWORD Id = GetCurrentProcessId();
HANDLE hProcess = OpenProcess( PROCESS_ALL_ACCESS, TRUE, Id );

Then, I pass this hProcess to another function that contains

SymGetSymFromAddr( hProcess, ... )

This function calls as stated above.

Is the method I'm using to get my process handle invalid, or what?

Thanks
gunnAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

jkrCommented:
You did call 'SymInitialize( hProcess, NULL, FALSE);', didn't you?
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
MadshiCommented:
The process handle should be okay...
0
gunnAuthor Commented:
I was not calling SymInitialize. I had glanced by it when trying to figure out what SymGetSymFromAddr() is and what it does, but after reading up on StackWalk(), I figured since it was passed in some of the Sym* functions and the process handle, that it must have done the initialization, and I didn't have to. Guess I should have tried it.

Ok, in any case, no more error 6. Now an error 126! "The specified module could not be found". I assume its looking for the symbol file(s)... I even tried using the 2nd parameter of SymInitialize() to add all the paths to all the modules that were loaded in my example (there were 5 of them; my program, ntdll.dll, kernel32.dll, psapi.dll, and imghelp.dll ). Didn't work.

Actually, this is a new question I guess ;)

0
jkrCommented:
You'll have to

SymLoadModule ( hProcess, NULL, "myexe.exe", NULL, NULL, NULL);

;-)
0
gunnAuthor Commented:
Ahhh, that seemed to work and returned non-zero address. But now (once again), it fails and this time the error is 487. "ERROR_INVALID_ADDRESS". I did some searching and found that this error 487 is common. But, I've loaded the symbol using the above function you gave me, so that gets around the common problem of not running the .exe from its directory.

What I did find in the MSDN database, ID: Q222103, is that using MSVC++6 .pdb files, the IMAGEHLP dll shipped with NT4 can't read them and generates this error!

Now I guess I need to find the updated imagehlp.dll file and ***hopefully*** that will be the last of this! Now where to find it....
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Microsoft Development

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.