Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Read and respond

Posted on 2000-02-20
7
Medium Priority
?
189 Views
Last Modified: 2011-09-20
Win32 SDK or MFC?
which is better?
which is faster?
which is easyer?
...ect.
0
Comment
Question by:scooter1
7 Comments
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:bbousquet
ID: 2541172
Better:

It depends on what you want to do and what your experience is. I personally prefer MFC but some people prefer straight Win32 - probably because you end up closer to the 'real thing' (that is, Win32 itself).

Faster:

Straight Win32, obviously. MFC *does* add an overhead to everything you're doing.

Easier:

I'd say MFC, without a doubt. It hides some of the ugly stuff from the programmer (not all, though!).
0
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:JMu
ID: 2541600
I'm one who don't like MFC. It was designed in early 16 bits age. It was designed for user interface.

I do a lots of Windows NT services, program serial communication, use event driven WinSock2 on NT service, etc. For all of this there is no possibility to use MFC.

So, at work I mix few MFC things (CString and CList, etc) and Win32, but at home I write all stuff without MFC. I have my own light weight class library built on top of Win32. Small and fast.

So, it depends on your needs and skills, but remember MFC has it's limitations.

JMu
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:Wyn
ID: 2541759
which is better?
which is faster?
which is easyer?
--------------------

All depond on the nature of what you are going to do.....
0
Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 10

Accepted Solution

by:
RONSLOW earned 0 total points
ID: 2544553
MFC better and easier if you want a to build your application on a simple framework.  MFC does a LOT of work for you, and saved you from losts of mistakes and traps that you may otherwise fall into.

SDK is best when some functionality is not handled by MFC.

Also note that ATL is often an even better alternative, as it nicely and simple encapsulates windows SDK in classes.  Much less overhead than MFC (no library .. all templates).
0
 

Author Comment

by:scooter1
ID: 2582336
This question has a deletion request Pending
0
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:bbousquet
ID: 2582353
This question no longer is pending deletion
0
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:bbousquet
ID: 2582354
Usually, one does not delete a question that has received as many good quality comments.

You are expected, then, to credit the author of one (or more) of these good comments with the answer - and the points, obviously.
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Unlike C#, C++ doesn't have native support for sealing classes (so they cannot be sub-classed). At the cost of a virtual base class pointer it is possible to implement a pseudo sealing mechanism The trick is to virtually inherit from a base class…
Introduction This article is the first in a series of articles about the C/C++ Visual Studio Express debugger.  It provides a quick start guide in using the debugger. Part 2 focuses on additional topics in breakpoints.  Lastly, Part 3 focuses on th…
The viewer will learn additional member functions of the vector class. Specifically, the capacity and swap member functions will be introduced.
The viewer will be introduced to the member functions push_back and pop_back of the vector class. The video will teach the difference between the two as well as how to use each one along with its functionality.

972 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question