<div>
Security on either NT or Linux can be as tight as you need it to be!!! &nbsp;I think securing NT is easier.<br />
<br />
From what I've seen so far Win2K is to NT4 as Win98 is to Win95. &nbsp;There are some goodies, but if you're Service Packed up on the older platform, you might as well hang tight.
</div>


Security on either NT or Linux can be as tight as you need it to be!!!  I think securing NT is easier.

From what I've seen so far Win2K is to NT4 as Win98 is to Win95.  There are some goodies, but if you're Service Packed up on the older platform, you might as well hang tight.

<div>
do you have any sort of bechmarks for windows and linux &nbsp;secure server<br />
or any links that do have a test or a comparission between the two of them <br />
thanx a lot<br />

</div>


do you have any sort of bechmarks for windows and linux  secure server
or any links that do have a test or a comparission between the two of them
thanx a lot


<div>
<a href="http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/first-nts4rhlinux.html" rel="ugc">http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/first-nts4rhlinux.html</a><br />

</div>


http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/first-nts4rhlinux.html [http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/first-nts4rhlinux.html]


<div>
<a href="http://www.linuxbusiness.com/en/bench.html" rel="ugc">http://www.linuxbusiness.com/en/bench.html</a>
</div>


http://www.linuxbusiness.com/en/bench.html [http://www.linuxbusiness.com/en/bench.html]

<div>
I work here with Linux and W2K. About the security one thing. You can make the security so hard like you want. I don't find any big difference with these two. (You must understand that you work with two different OS versions)<br />
I have here the slackware version and the redhat version, only one thing W2K is mutch easy to setup security and is not like Linux.<br />
<br />
Mario
</div>


I work here with Linux and W2K. About the security one thing. You can make the security so hard like you want. I don't find any big difference with these two. (You must understand that you work with two different OS versions)
I have here the slackware version and the redhat version, only one thing W2K is mutch easy to setup security and is not like Linux.

Mario

<div>
<div class="content wysiwyg-content">
how secure is a windows nt5 or windows 2000 server in comparision with linux os anyversion redhat or &nbsp;maindrak<br />
and is windows 2000 as good as the say <br />
it is or it is just a new microsoft product like 98 thanx a lot<br />
&nbsp;
</div>
</div>


how secure is a windows nt5 or windows 2000 server in comparision with linux os anyversion redhat or  maindrak
and is windows 2000 as good as the say 
it is or it is just a new microsoft product like 98 thanx a lot
 

win2000 security

Windows 2000 is an operating system for use on both client and server computers. It is the successor to Windows NT 4.0, and is the last version of Microsoft Windows to display the "Windows NT" designation. Four editions of Windows 2000 were released (Professional, Server, Advanced Server, and Datacenter Server) that shared a core set of features, including many system utilities such as the Microsoft Management Console. All versions of the operating system support NTFS 3.0, Encrypting File System, as well as basic and dynamic disk storage. The Windows 2000 Server family includes support for Active Directory services, Distributed File System and fault-redundant storage volumes.