Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 229
  • Last Modified:

A driver that supports jdbc2.0

we're using the features of jdbc2.0 (such as moveToInsertRow,updateX,insertRow) and we get the following exception:

java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException at sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcResultSet.moveToInsertRow(JdbcOdbcResultSet.java:2968) at JConnection.main(JConnection.java:37)
Exception in thread "main" Process Exit...

Is there a driver that supports jdbc2.0 (free)
or we have to buy one (which)?
0
twg
Asked:
twg
1 Solution
 
technomanCommented:
What database are you using?
0
 
heyhey_Commented:
0
 
jpk041897Commented:
If its for Oracle, they have several free ones at:

technet.oracle.com
0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 
twgAuthor Commented:
Hi,
I'm using access databases and databases which are on the as/400 system (using client access).
Can you recommend me of a driver that supports jdbc2.0?
Isn't it possible to download a driver from somewhere (like the one which is supplied with the sdk for jdbc1.2?)
0
 
jpk041897Commented:
Unless I am mistaken (which is likley since I do very little work on that platform), Visual Age for Java  V. 3  Enterprise edition has a class 3 JDBC (ODBC 2 compliant) driver for the AS/400. If not, why not use Toolkit 400? Aldo, I would think that VA for C++ should cary an ODBC 2 compliant AS400 driver.

You could ask IBM tech support for those particular details.

As far as Access, I have not purchased Office 2000 Pro but would assume that it would contain ODBC 2 drivers for access at this stage in the game. Check out their pages.

If you allready have earlier versions of their software (Office/Visual Studio) and VA for Java/C++,  you can usualy upgrade the drivers at no cost.
0
 
twgAuthor Commented:
Hi jpk,
I'm not sure I understood your answer.
I used up to now the jdbc-odbc bridge (of sun) which supports the jdbc1.2 and I'm looking for something similar for jdbc2.0.
0
 
jpk041897Commented:
There are several types of JDBC drivers. Type 1 drivers use the odbc bridge.

Type 2 drivers are similar to odbc but use pure java to access the DB.

Type 3 drivers use RMI to access the DB, which means that the drivers have 2 components one for the client and one for the server.

Type 4 drivers (like Toolkit 400 and Oracles thin layer) access the DB nativley.

What this means is that the ODBC driver is a solution that you look for only if there are no better JDBC solutions available.

IBM has both a type 3 and a type 4 JDBC driver available for the AS400 though the type 3 requires QSHELL and QSHELL utilites to work.


Microsoft uses ODBC, ADO and/or DAO fo ACCESS. Since JDBC is only compatible with ODBC you would need such a driver there.
0
 
twgAuthor Commented:
Hi jpk,
using the jdbc-odbc bridge, I could access all types of databases (including db on as/400 -with 'client access') so therefore I'm looking for something similar. What do you recommend me to do if I want to use the jdbc2.0 features?
0
 
gageotCommented:
The sun JDBC-ODBC bridge bundled with JDK 1.3RC1 is JDBC2.0 compliant
0
 
jpk041897Commented:
Straight jdbc drivers (levels 2, 3 and 4) on the other hand, can be downloaded from the net to the client box (as in the case of applets) thus avoiding the issues of client side install and configuration.

Level 2 and 3 jdbc drivers are totaly portable across both platforms and architectures that support Java (level 4 drivers are db dependant so cannot port to other databases).

An additional, and serious, problem with ODBC is that evry time you install a product that contains a diffrent version of ODBC than the one you were working with, a whole lot of applications break. So tech support staffs have to spend a large ammount of time reconfiguring end user boxes.

So the only really valid reason for using odbc and the jdbc odbc bridge is when there are no straight jdbc drivers available.

This is not your case.

For the AS400, SQL400 there are several alternative solutions at the typel 3 and 4 jdbc driver level, both with and without client access so I would say that,at least as far as the AS400 is concerned, your best option is probably Visual Age for Java.

On the access end, on the other hand, the option is not as clear cut. There are several jdbc level 2 and 3 drivers available, see:

http://java.sun.com/products/jdbc/drivers.html

for a list of available driver (which also include some for the AS400).

As well as Microosofts odbc driver thats bundled with both Visual studio and Office Pro.

So the answer to what to use depends on wether you will be writting your db access code in pure java or if you will also be using VB, VC++ and/or other languages.

The bridge was written as Java's first entry into accessing databases, intended to allow java programmers to start writting db applications inmediatley, while the market produced straight java jdbc drivers.

That stage is over, the bridge has not been deprecated because of backwards compatibility and because there are still a few databases that are not supported by straight jdbc drivers.

All told, I would check the features of the available straight jdbc drivers. If they have what you need then use them. Performance will be better and portability won´t be an issue. If none of the these drivers meet your needs, only then would I begin a search for odbc drivers.

0
 
twgAuthor Commented:
I want to give the points to jpk but the problem is that his answers were in the comment textfields.
Is it possible to pass him the points?
0

Featured Post

New feature and membership benefit!

New feature! Upgrade and increase expert visibility of your issues with Priority Questions.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now