Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
?
Solved

Hide C++-Exported class in dll?

Posted on 2000-03-09
6
Medium Priority
?
397 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-10
I have a C++-DLL (non mfc) that exports a C++-Class now since I don't want everyone to see what functions this class has, I would like to hide the names of the functions
and the class in the relase dll.
Anyone done that already?
0
Comment
Question by:connex
  • 4
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 22

Accepted Solution

by:
nietod earned 300 total points
ID: 2600143
Are you saying you want the functions to be accessible by some users and not by others?

One way you can do that is with the use of virtual functions.  Virtual functions don't have to be exported from the DLL.  So you can declare these functions as virtual in the "real" class declaration, one that is provided for people why can call these functions.  But you also create a "crippled" class declaration for use by people that can't call the functions.  This declaration will have all the virtual functions listed without parameter and return value as with meaningless names, like reserved1(), reserved2(), etc.

Is that what you are asking for?

If not, can you explain?
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:connex
ID: 2600378
What i have is:
I have DLL exporting
class __declspec(dllexport) CExportClass
{
public:
  (Static funtions that need to be called)

  virtual (a bunch of virtuals that need to be overwritten)
}

Now I want the resulting DLL hiding the function names.
E.g. I make test.exe which has CMyExportClass : public CExportClass

The export.dll i want to give to users along with test.exe shall not show that there is a function e.g. "CExportClass::EncryptPassword" in it.

0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:nietod
ID: 2600492
I think I see.  when you do

class __declspec(dllexport) CExportClass

it tells the compiler to export all the functions in a class.  But you ohnly want to export specific functions.  To do that declare the class as usual and declare the functiosn to be exported with __declspec(dllexport).  Like

class CExportClass
{
public:
   void EncryptPassword(char *); // not exported
__declspec(dllexport) bool EnterPassword(char *); // Exported.
};

Now you can give the user of this DLL this very class definition if you want.  they will not be able to call the non-exported functions (like EncryptPassword()) becuase they will get link errors.  Or you can give them  an altered class defintion that doesn't list the non-exported members.

Note for this to work, the non-exported members may not be virtual.  if any are virtual, you need to use my first suggestion for them.
0
Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:connex
ID: 2600564
That's not the problem.

I just want to prevent that DLL lists the function names etc. when viewing it with dpwalk or stuff like that.

The users of the dll will always get the complete definition. But Endusers shall not be able to reverse engineer it without mayor efforts .)

0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:nietod
ID: 2600654
>> That's not the problem.
What are you referring to?  Are you saying I haven't answered the question?

>> prevent that DLL lists the function names etc.
>> when viewing it with dpwalk
Are you saying you want to let the user's call the functions, but don't want them listed in the DLL?  Why?  You can use virtual functions for that, but why bother?

>> The users of the dll will always get the complete
>> definition. But Endusers shall not be able to reverse
>> engineer it
What are you hoping to d that will make reverse engenering harder?  
0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:nietod
ID: 2619358
Has this been answered then?
0

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Often, when implementing a feature, you won't know how certain events should be handled at the point where they occur and you'd rather defer to the user of your function or class. For example, a XML parser will extract a tag from the source code, wh…
IntroductionThis article is the second in a three part article series on the Visual Studio 2008 Debugger.  It provides tips in setting and using breakpoints. If not familiar with this debugger, you can find a basic introduction in the EE article loc…
The viewer will learn how to use the return statement in functions in C++. The video will also teach the user how to pass data to a function and have the function return data back for further processing.
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.
Suggested Courses

564 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question