Solved

TerminateThread while using COM

Posted on 2000-03-14
8
252 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-25
How should I terminate a thread, while the thread is using a COM service.
0
Comment
Question by:rskathait
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • +1
8 Comments
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:Wyn
ID: 2618737
Why terminate ,you'd let it end naturally or what you need ?
0
 
LVL 11

Accepted Solution

by:
mikeblas earned 10 total points
ID: 2618927
Never, ever, _ever_ call the TerminateThread() API.

..B ekiM
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:Wyn
ID: 2618989
he he
0
 

Expert Comment

by:decaffeinated
ID: 2626632
"mikeblas" (who incidentally is none other than the Lord God of MFC, Mr. Mike Blasczak himself!) is absolutely right about the TerminateThread() function.  That is just about the most evil function there is.  If you call that, the thread you've terminated will never clean up it's stack or release any resources it may have.  Very very bad.  If you find yourself using it, you probably need to think about redesigning your code.

The standard way to "terminate" a thread is really more like asking the thread to terminate and then waiting for it to do so.  This requires that _your_ code to be the code that starts the thread and (usually) that _you_ author the thread's thread-procedure.  If you are talking about a thread created by a third party, then these steps don't apply to you -- your probably out of luck.

Generally all the techniques I'm going to describe here require that there is some custom flag that the thread's procedure checks from time to time (call it the "kill" flag).  When the threadproc sees that flag set it knows it's time to exit.

One way involves passing some sort of handle (e.g. an event handle) to the thread at startup time and having that thread periodically wait on that handle.  When you want the thread to end, you set the event.

Alternately you could have some custom interthread message that you post to the thread via ::PostThreadMessage.  A variation on this is to post a custom window message to a window that was created by the thread.  When the thread/window receives the message it sets the "kill" flag (or does PostQuitMessage).

A third way (and this only applies to threads that perform alertable waits) is to QueueUserAPC to a custom APC function (in the thread you want to terminate) that sets some custom flag that will cause the thread procedure to exit the next time it


Joe O'
0
Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:rskathait
ID: 2638721
Thanks mikeblas and decaffeinated. I was knowing these things and wanted to know the exact scenario like what will COM do. OK, it is dangerous to the thread but will COM shutdown cleanly?

rgds,
rskathait
0
 

Expert Comment

by:decaffeinated
ID: 2638752
If you shut down a thread via ::TerminateThread() then no, COM will not shutdown cleanly for that thread.  It allocates resources when you call CoInitialize(Ex) that will never be freed.

However if you terminate it the safe way as I described previously, then yes, COM will shutdown cleanly (provided of course your thread procedure calls CoUninitialize once for every time it previously called CoInitialize).

But regardless of which method you choose, the only damage you are likely to do will be confied to the boundaries process.  Even if you resort to TerminateThread, other processes that use COM will not be affected once your process terminates.
0
 
LVL 11

Expert Comment

by:mikeblas
ID: 2647629
> Even if you resort to TerminateThread, other processes that
 > use COM will not be affected once your process terminates.

I'd never make such a guarantee.

..B ekiM
0
 

Expert Comment

by:decaffeinated
ID: 2650447
Oops, didn't mean to make any sort of guarantee.  I should have used the word "likely" where I said "will".

(not that I would ever want anyone to use TerminateThread, though)
0

Featured Post

Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

C++ Properties One feature missing from standard C++ that you will find in many other Object Oriented Programming languages is something called a Property (http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Languages/CPP/A_3912-Object-Properties-in-C.ht…
After several hours of googling I could not gather any information on this topic. There are several ways of controlling the USB port connected to any storage device. The best example of that is by changing the registry value of "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\S…
The viewer will learn how to pass data into a function in C++. This is one step further in using functions. Instead of only printing text onto the console, the function will be able to perform calculations with argumentents given by the user.
The viewer will learn additional member functions of the vector class. Specifically, the capacity and swap member functions will be introduced.

930 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

13 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now