Solved

Perl Purgatory

Posted on 2000-03-16
3
142 Views
Last Modified: 2010-03-05
Yes, I am beyond the beginning and not anywhere near the end.  I managed to successfully install the P and actually wrote some small scripts for a web form.  Mine were no where as keen as MailForm or some of the others so I just did my clients a favor and used those...=)  So I can honestly say I am on my way but I ain't there yet.  

My question is this...the previous install was on a win95 machine and of course this went straight to MS-DOS now I have another machine, you guessed it win98 and before I did the last install (which I believe is the key to success) I read all  (yes, well MOST) of the documentation and newsgroup discussions.  Now I am back to reading them and there is not one mention of win98 ANYWHERE...am I losing it and just haven't grasped that the techheads (affectionately said from a wanta be) are lumping win95/win98's MS-DOS Perl binary, together?  Or, am I barking up the wrong tree and just need to give up the fancy feel of 98?  what about 2000?

In a while, this problem will be solved seeing that I am now going over to the Linux/Win dual boot question category and find out some more things...hopefully this time next year I can chant, "Beware of the penguins", and mean it.

Patche
0
Comment
Question by:patche
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:PC_User321
ID: 2626324
For all intents and purposes, Win95 and Win98 are identical.
I thing '98 was a political move by M$ to get their browser integrated into the operating system.

Perl runs in the DOS shell, which is also the same under 95 and 98.
0
 
LVL 5

Accepted Solution

by:
PC_User321 earned 5 total points
ID: 2626373
The title of you post suggests that you are anticipating difficulties.  I have installed Perl on Win98 and WinNT with no problems at all.  It works well.

The Unix version is better than the PC version in the following respects:

1. Handles command line parameters better
2. Does forks and pipes better
3. More control over file attributes
4. Can you file names without having to double-up the backslashes
5. ? (probably a few more things)

Apart from the above, you should have to problems with Perl under Win9x/WinNT and (presumably) Win2000
0
 

Author Comment

by:patche
ID: 2626471
I definitely can understand at this point the +'s involved with UNIX over win.  

I would add stability and security to that list.  Two very important things to any web head...

Patche
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

On Microsoft Windows, if  when you click or type the name of a .pl file, you get an error "is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file", then this means you do not have the .pl file extension associated with …
I have been pestered over the years to produce and distribute regular data extracts, and often the request have explicitly requested the data be emailed as an Excel attachement; specifically Excel, as it appears: CSV files confuse (no Red or Green h…
Explain concepts important to validation of email addresses with regular expressions. Applies to most languages/tools that uses regular expressions. Consider email address RFCs: Look at HTML5 form input element (with type=email) regex pattern: T…

685 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question