Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people, just like you, are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
Solved

Thread nerver returns from WaitForSingleObject() !!!

Posted on 2000-03-22
2
238 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-03
I've a Mutex and 3 threads like below

HANDLE HMutex;  
bool   End = false;
//////
/////
void Thread_Running_1()
{
  do
  {
     WaitForSingleObejct( HMutex, INFINITE );
     // ..... do something important
  }
  while( ! End );
}  
//////
/////
void Thread_Running_2()
{
  do
  {
     WaitForSingleObejct( HMutex, INFINITE );
     // ..... do something important
  }
  while( ! End );
}  
//////
//////   The main() function is only a case school
//////
void main()
{
   // I create and lock the mutex

   HMutex = CreateMutex( ..... );
   WaitForSingleObejct( HMutex, INFINITE );

   // I create 2 threads and i start these threads

   CreateThread( ...., Thread_Running_1, ..... );
   CreateThread( ...., Thread_Running_2, ..... );

   // At this time, Thread 1 and 2 are in a wait state.
   // Now, We release and close the Mutex

   End = true;
   ReleaseMutex( HMutex );
   CloseHandle( HMutex );
   
   // At this time, the HMutex is REALLY DESTROYED
}  


The trouble is when i release and close the Mutex handle,
only one thread will continue running. The other thread is
DEFINITELY lost. You can see the thread in "perfmon.exe".
You must call TerminateThread() api to shutdown the thread,
because the thread never returns from WaitForSingleObject().

When i close the Mutex handle, i do not know how many threads
are awaiting the mutex to be released. We could think that
the CloseHandle() will cease the WaitForSingleObject() execution
by returning WAIT_FAILED to threads but it DOES NOT.

This is same thing for Critical Section, Event, Semaphore.

MY QUESTION :
How to prevent the thread from being lost ?
 
0
Comment
Question by:mars
  • 2
2 Comments
 
LVL 22

Accepted Solution

by:
nietod earned 100 total points
ID: 2646034
First of all, you really shoudl be using critical sections for this, not mutexes.

next you need to declare end as volatile, otherwise it may be optimized out of existance, preventing the threads from ending.  (VERY likely.)

Finally  you should not close the mutex handle unil the other threads finish.  To do this you can wait on the thread handles with WaitForSingleObject().  The wait function will return when the thread ends.  So use this to wait until two the additional threads are done, then close the mutex handle

let me know if you have any quesitons.
0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:nietod
ID: 2646046
One more thing the threads that lock the mutex never release it.  You should have them release the mutex before then terminate.
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Path Explorer

An intuitive utility to help find the CSS path to UI elements on a webpage. These paths are used frequently in a variety of front-end development and QA automation tasks.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

After several hours of googling I could not gather any information on this topic. There are several ways of controlling the USB port connected to any storage device. The best example of that is by changing the registry value of "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\S…
Entering time in Microsoft Access can be difficult. An input mask often bothers users more than helping them and won't catch all typing errors. This article shows how to create a textbox for 24-hour time input with full validation politely catching …
This is Part 3 in a 3-part series on Experts Exchange to discuss error handling in VBA code written for Excel. Part 1 of this series discussed basic error handling code using VBA. http://www.experts-exchange.com/videos/1478/Excel-Error-Handlin…

856 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question