Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

Best machine for a server, 4400 or 6100?

Posted on 2000-03-22
3
Medium Priority
?
257 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-17
I have 6 macs on an ethernet network, a 7100, 6116, 640, Pb3400, 4400 and a 6100.  I want to dedicate one of the last 2 as a server.  My bookkeeper will use the other one.  The main database file (Omnis) will go on the server.  The bookkeeper will be the heaviest user of it, but others in the office will access the same file from time to time.  Currently the bookkeeper is using the 4400 (200 mhz) and the database file is on it.  My concern is that if I dedicate the 4400 as the server, the bookkeeper will find the 6100 (66 mhz) to be considerably slower.  But if I use the 6100 as the server, it will not be fast enough for the network.  Which machine would make the better server in this scenario?
0
Comment
Question by:Quackerback
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 30

Accepted Solution

by:
weed earned 200 total points
ID: 2650237
I would use the 6100. I have used one in the past as a server and its a truly marvelous mac. Incredibly stable and it can take some hits as far as processing. Its only slow point is the built in HD but unless youre going to have lots of people hitting it at the same time that shouldnt be an issue. Otherwise the 6100 will be plenty fast for serving a few files and even route internet traffic. The bookkeeper will find the 6100 unbearably slow for any meaningful work. Definitely give them the 4400 which would make a poor server anyway. The 4400s were a bit flaky so its not something you want to make into your important office server.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Quackerback
ID: 2650562
Thanks!  (So how are the 4400s flaky???)
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:weed
ID: 2651183
They were just a weird model. It was sort of a cross between a performa and an AIO...They werent big sellers either. Back in that weird transition period when apple was having issues.
0

Featured Post

Hire Technology Freelancers with Gigs

Work with freelancers specializing in everything from database administration to programming, who have proven themselves as experts in their field. Hire the best, collaborate easily, pay securely, and get projects done right.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Thanks to luck and dedication (hitting refresh every 5 seconds when the pre-orders were going live at midnight on April 10th) I managed to actually receive an Apple Watch on release day, April 24th. Which means I’ve been using it daily for just ov…
Article by: Justin
In light of the WannaCry ransomware attack that affected millions of Windows machines, you might wonder if your Mac needs protecting. Yes, it does and here is how to do it.
This course is ideal for IT System Administrators working with VMware vSphere and its associated products in their company infrastructure. This course teaches you how to install and maintain this virtualization technology to store data, prevent vuln…
In response to a need for security and privacy, and to continue fostering an environment members can turn to for support, solutions, and education, Experts Exchange has created anonymous question capabilities. This new feature is available to our Pr…

715 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question