C++ questions here......

1)
Is default constructor provided only when no user defined constructor is defined in msvc?

2)Is there any difference in the way default constructor is provided by c++ in Turboc++ and MSVC?

3)what is  a virtual destructor used for?

4)Is runtime polymorphism implemented by use of having virtual functions
or by having a base class pointer that can point to any one if its subclasses?


Thanks sridhar
kesavan_sridharAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
nietodConnect With a Mentor Commented:
>> Is default constructor provided only when
>> no user defined constructor is defined in msvc?
This has nothing to do with MSVC.  It is part of standard C++.  A class will have an auto-generated default constructor, if:
a) you have not written any constructors for the class
b) all of its base classes have default constructors
c) all of its non-static data members have default constructors.

If these conditions are not met, the class will not have a default constructor generated by compiler.   You can still write a defautl constructor for the class, if desired.

continues
0
 
nietodCommented:
>> is there any difference in the way default constructor
>> is provided by c++ in Turboc++ and MSVC?
I don'rt know what you mean by "provided".  But the default constructor may be implimented differently on different compilers, but that should not matter to you.  However the default constructor will have (or should have) the same behavior on all compilers.  However, turbo C++ is long long out-of-date, so there may be cases where it does not behave as prescribed by the standard.  Although you are not likely to find those sorts of problems in the default constructor, but I guess it is possible.
0
 
nietodCommented:
>> what is  a virtual destructor used for?
Like any other destructor, it is used to "clean-up" an object that it being destoyed.  It may be used to free resources used by the object, or don other class-specific clean-up tasks.

By making a destructor virtual you are assured that the destructor for a derived calss will be called correctly when an object of a derived class type is destroyed using a reference to one of its base classes.  i.e. if you delete using a pointer to an object that is typed as a base class pointer, but the object might be of a derived class, the destructor should be made virtual so that the right destructor is found and used at run time.  Otherwise, only the base class destructor will always be called, even if the object is a derived class object.

>> 4)Is runtime polymorphism implemented by use
>> of having virtual functions or by having a base
>> class pointer that can point to any one if its subclasses?
Both.
0
 
kesavan_sridharAuthor Commented:
Thanks nietod for your answers....

bye sridhar
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.