Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

2000 server and lsass.exe

Posted on 2000-04-22
4
Medium Priority
?
206 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-04
what is lsass.exe?
why is it eating up to 18MB RAM?
why can i not do an "end task" on it?
how do i disable it?

thanks...
0
Comment
Question by:loyaliser
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:pjknibbs
ID: 2741269
LSASS.EXE is the Local Security Authority subsystem, and it is vital to the operation of the system. It handles the low-level details of all Windows 2000 security including logins; therefore you cannot do an END TASK on it and you cannot disable it. As for why it's using 18Mb of RAM--do you have a *lot* of users attached to the server? Is your security setup particularly complicated? LSASS.EXE only takes up 900K on my Win2K Professional system, which is only ever used by me.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:loyaliser
ID: 2741309
interesting...

well, i only have 14 accounts on my system (one is mine, and the rest are various system/domain accounts)... so i am baffled as to why it is 18MB.

i have tried restarting the machine with no change in size.

could it be that i have active directory installed?

then again, this machine is used at home and no one else accesses any of the accounts but me?!?!

thanks...
0
 
LVL 12

Accepted Solution

by:
pjknibbs earned 400 total points
ID: 2741347
According to information in the MSDN Library, the directory service under Windows 2000 is actually part of LSASS.EXE--thus, if your machine is a domain controller, it might explain why your LSASS is so much larger than mine. Unfortunately I can't find any work-round for the problem. Out of interest, is having LSASS so big seriously degrading the performance of your machine, or are you just optimising for the sake of optimisation?
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:loyaliser
ID: 2741888
i don't believe it is degrading the performance... since i still have about 100MB RAM available... just curious as to why it is like this...

thanks!
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Path Explorer

An intuitive utility to help find the CSS path to UI elements on a webpage. These paths are used frequently in a variety of front-end development and QA automation tasks.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

NTFS file system has been developed by Microsoft that is widely used by Windows NT operating system and its advanced versions. It is the mostly used over FAT file system as it provides superior features like reliability, security, storage, efficienc…
If you are a mobile app developer and especially develop hybrid mobile apps then these 4 mistakes you must avoid for hybrid app development to be the more genuine app developer.
In this brief tutorial Pawel from AdRem Software explains how you can quickly find out which services are running on your network, or what are the IP addresses of servers responsible for each service. Software used is freeware NetCrunch Tools (https…
In this video, Percona Solution Engineer Dimitri Vanoverbeke discusses why you want to use at least three nodes in a database cluster. To discuss how Percona Consulting can help with your design and architecture needs for your database and infras…
Suggested Courses

705 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question