Solved

memory debug in mfc

Posted on 2000-05-09
6
652 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-20
Is there a way to alter the memory debug behavior of mfc?

Mfc checks for memory leaks *before* the program exits (thus reporting
memory leaks on globals).  This generates a lot of messages in my
application (and I get annoyed by them). (for instance, try this:
#include <iostream> #include <crtdbg.h> void main () {
_CrtDumpMemoryLeaks() }; ,this'll generate false memory leak messages
and this is exactly what mfc does).

Normally you can do something like :

_CrtSetDbgFlag(_CrtSetDbgFlag(_CRTDBG_REPORT_FLAG)
      | _CRTDBG_LEAK_CHECK_DF | _CRTDBG_ALLOC_MEM_DF
      | _CRTDBG_CHECK_ALWAYS_DF);

,but I guess mfc resets those flag bits.

So, can anyone advise me on this one?
0
Comment
Question by:podb
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:jkr
ID: 2792309
There are actually two things that can be done to prevent this:

- turn off the debugging flags

// Get the current state of the flag
// and store it in a temporary variable
int tmpFlag = _CrtSetDbgFlag( _CRTDBG_REPORT_FLAG );

tmpFlag &= ~_CRTDBG_CHECK_ALWAYS_DF;
tmpFlag &= ~_CRTDBG_LEAK_CHECK_DF ;
tmpFlag &= ~_CRTDBG_ALLOC_MEM_DF ;

// Set the new state for the flag
_CrtSetDbgFlag( tmpFlag );

- 'swallow' the messages:

int     _CRTAPI1    __MygReportHook (   int     nType,  
                                        char    *pszMsg,
                                        int     *pnRetVal
                                    )
{

    return( TRUE);
}

_CrtSetReportHook   (   ( _CRT_REPORT_HOOK) __MyReportHook);



0
 

Author Comment

by:podb
ID: 2792381
I don't want to prevent memory debug, I only want to do it at program exit. Normally you do that by setting the _CRTDBG_ALLOC_MEM_DF flag.
I have tried to add this (see *) to my application constructor (is this the correct place to add this?), but it didn't help (that's why I thought mfc is calling _CrtSetDbgFlag itself).

(*)
_CrtSetDbgFlag(_CrtSetDbgFlag(_CRTDBG_REPORT_FLAG)
      | _CRTDBG_LEAK_CHECK_DF | _CRTDBG_ALLOC_MEM_DF
      | _CRTDBG_CHECK_ALWAYS_DF);

So, the question is: how do I tell mfc to only do a memory leak test at program exit?

By the way, jkr, thanks for taking the time.
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:MDarling
ID: 2792634
There's a flag called afxMemDF which you can use.  Not sure you can only check at exit though.

regards,
Mike.
0
Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 

Author Comment

by:podb
ID: 2792646
No, you cannot.
0
 
LVL 86

Accepted Solution

by:
jkr earned 200 total points
ID: 2792753
Well, after swiching off the debug logging (as I erroneously suggested before), you could always call

_CrtDumpMemoryLeaks ();

before your program exits.

OR:

(at startup)

_CrtMemState state ;

_CrtMemCheckpoint( &state );

(at shutdown)

_CrtMemDumpAllObjectsSince( &state );
0
 

Author Comment

by:podb
ID: 2792857
I see no good reason to call _CrtDumpMemoryLeaks().  This will always be called *before* globals, etc. are destroyed.  Setting the flag _CRTDBG_ALLOC_MEM_DF, however gives the right behavior.

I have done some tracking myself and in ...\mfc\src\dumpinit.cpp, line 131, in the destructor of _AFX_DEBUG_STATE you'll see the call to _CrtDumpMemoryLeaks(), which is called through CProcessLocal<_AFX_DEBUG_STATE>::~CProcessLocal<_AFX_DEBUG_STATE>() (This is called when there are still 8 calls on the call stack).

But hey, you can have the 200 points.  I'm starting to belief there is no good solution.
0

Featured Post

Enroll in May's Course of the Month

May’s Course of the Month is now available! Experts Exchange’s Premium Members and Team Accounts have access to a complimentary course each month as part of their membership—an extra way to increase training and boost professional development.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Tab names are off by one 5 54
sumNumber challenge 16 145
substring method in java 1 141
Is there a simple front-end menu system. 9 146
Introduction: Database storage, where is the exe actually on the disc? Playing a game selected randomly (how to generate random numbers).  Error trapping with try..catch to help the code run even if something goes wrong. Continuing from the seve…
Introduction: The undo support, implementing a stack. Continuing from the eigth article about sudoku.   We need a mechanism to keep track of the digits entered so as to implement an undo mechanism.  This should be a ‘Last In First Out’ collec…
This video will show you how to get GIT to work in Eclipse.   It will walk you through how to install the EGit plugin in eclipse and how to checkout an existing repository.
Attackers love to prey on accounts that have privileges. Reducing privileged accounts and protecting privileged accounts therefore is paramount. Users, groups, and service accounts need to be protected to help protect the entire Active Directory …

734 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question