Solved

Very very easy question

Posted on 2000-05-17
6
176 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-02
If I have object bigcookie
class cookie{
public:
int chocolatechips;
};
cookie bigcookie;

and a function in a namespace:
namespace foodfuncs{
void bigcookie(void){}
}

If I say 'using foodfuncs' bigcookie thenceforth refers to foodfuncs::bigcookie.

How do I make it refer to the cookie object again? Am I right in thinking it is a compile-time issue, and in the executable, these two entities will have different names?

Thank you
0
Comment
Question by:glebspy
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 

Expert Comment

by:forza
ID: 2818589
>How do I make it refer to the cookie object again?
What do you mean by "again"?
You cannot have the bigcookie func refer to the object. Why would you do that?
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:glebspy
ID: 2818614
ok I have the above followed by:

void main(void);
cookie bigcookie;
bigcookie.chocolatechips=1;

//Now I use the namespace
using foodfuncs:
bigcookie();

//ok so far so good but now I want to
//be able to say
bigcookie.chocolatechips=3;
//which I can't because thanks to my //using statement bigcookie means
//the function bigcookie

So now I hope you understand the question
thank you
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:glebspy
ID: 2818624
ok I have the above followed by:

void main(void);
cookie bigcookie;
bigcookie.chocolatechips=1;

//Now I use the namespace
using foodfuncs:
bigcookie();

//ok so far so good but now I want to
//be able to say
bigcookie.chocolatechips=3;
//which I can't because thanks to my //using statement bigcookie means
//the function bigcookie

So now I hope you understand the question
thank you
0
Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 22

Accepted Solution

by:
nietod earned 5 total points
ID: 2818974
Try

::bigcookie.chocolatechips=3;

0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:glebspy
ID: 2819064
I really wanted to know how to reverse the effect of the 'using' statement for good, rather than just that one instance - still I guess its worth 5 points
0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:nietod
ID: 2819250
>> I really wanted to know how to reverse
>> the effect of the 'using' statement for good
Then you should have asked that.

And you should not have given a bad grade for an answer that was correct, but just not what you wanted--especially since I didn't answer. I would much much rather have not had the points than have a bad grade in my record.

I believe that a using declaration obeys scope rules.  So use it inside a scope and it will not extend outside of that scope.
0

Featured Post

[Webinar] Learn How Hackers Steal Your Credentials

Do You Know How Hackers Steal Your Credentials? Join us and Skyport Systems to learn how hackers steal your credentials and why Active Directory must be secure to stop them. Thursday, July 13, 2017 10:00 A.M. PDT

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Templates For Beginners Or How To Encourage The Compiler To Work For You Introduction This tutorial is targeted at the reader who is, perhaps, familiar with the basics of C++ but would prefer a little slower introduction to the more ad…
This article will show you some of the more useful Standard Template Library (STL) algorithms through the use of working examples.  You will learn about how these algorithms fit into the STL architecture, how they work with STL containers, and why t…
The goal of the tutorial is to teach the user how to use functions in C++. The video will cover how to define functions, how to call functions and how to create functions prototypes. Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 Express will be used as a text editor an…
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.

630 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question