Solved

Routing and Remote Access

Posted on 2001-06-06
9
148 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-13
I have a W2K Server box setup doing NAT between my ADSL modem and the internal LAN. No probs really in setting it up and the translation seems to work fine for all the machines in the LAN.

I've also installed a modem on this server and would like to dial into it for remote access. I can establish a RAS session (from another W2K machine with a modem) and can see (ping) the machines on the inside LAN.

What I cannot seem to figure out is how to configure the server so that the RAS dialled in user can also access the Internet via the DSL.

For some reason when I do an ipconfig (on the dialled in box) it shows my gateway as the same as the ip address (i.e. something like 192.168.0.100)

The Gateway should (I would have thought) be set to the server itself 192.168.0.1

Any ideas on how to set the gateway for RAS users?

Am I barking up the wrong tree?

Can this even be done at all?

Do I need some static routes or something like that?

You help is appreciated.


Regards
Marty
0
Comment
Question by:mravell
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
9 Comments
 
LVL 14

Accepted Solution

by:
AvonWyss earned 200 total points
ID: 6159327
In RRAS on the server (!), create a dial-on-demand interface named exactly the same as the dialin user. Put anything as password and destination number.

This interface will be used on the server when the user dials in. Because of this, you can add the user's interface to the NAT as private interface, et voila, he will have access via the NAT.

This wortks also for VPN connection, and it's also useful if you need to assign some special routes to a specific user.
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:dcgames
ID: 6159882
Avon,

Can you point to some info on this or elaborate a bit? This sounds like a useful technique.

Dave
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:Portang
ID: 6159977
???

The limitation of Windows 2000 RRAS is that you can only have no more than one NAT routing.

And ... Windows 2000's implementation of NAT requires exactly two interfaces - one, and only one private, and one, and only one public.

Surely you're free to create as many interfaces as you like. But you can only assign ONE private interface for NAT. Unfortunately, that one happens to be the internal LAN adapter, so anything else is out of luck.

ONE, and only ONE private interface!
0
Complete VMware vSphere® ESX(i) & Hyper-V Backup

Capture your entire system, including the host, with patented disk imaging integrated with VMware VADP / Microsoft VSS and RCT. RTOs is as low as 15 seconds with Acronis Active Restore™. You can enjoy unlimited P2V/V2V migrations from any source (even from a different hypervisor)

 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:AvonWyss
ID: 6160043
Portang, sorry but you're wrong. You can have as many interfaces (both public and private) as you want for NAT. The routing is done in regards of the routing table and can include several interfaces. I use this all the time myself.

Dave, Windows 2000 RAS will connect an existing DOD interface to a connecting user if the interface has the user's name. This allows to have special routes or bindings (NAT for instance) for single users. You could say that DOD interfaces are not only outgoing, but also ingoing.
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:Portang
ID: 6160096
> You can have as many interfaces (both public and private) as you want for NAT.

Maybe I'm wrong ... but I do have trouble adding more than two interfaces into the "Network Address Translation" routing protocol.
0
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:AvonWyss
ID: 6160124
Portang, be my guest and look at my NAT config (it's in German, but you'll get the idea) here: http://snoopy.horsenet.ch/nat.gif

I have two public interfaces ("Internet" and "Internet ISDN") and three private interfaces ("LAN-Verbindung", "VPN-Mammut" and "VPN-Goliath"). This works like a charm.
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:Portang
ID: 6161430
This is amazing. I'll go ahead and give it a try.

Thanks a lot Avon. A picture is worth a thousand words!
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:cempasha
ID: 8194829
Dear questionner/expert(s)

No comment has been added lately, so it's time to clean up this TA.
I'll leave a recommendation in the Cleanup topic area that this question is to be:

- Answered by: AvonWyss

Please leave any comments here within the next seven days.

==> PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER ! <==

PaSHa

Cleanup volunteer



0
 

Expert Comment

by:Chmod
ID: 8241349
As recommended

Chmod
Community Support Moderator @Experts Exchange
0

Featured Post

Best Practices: Disaster Recovery Testing

Besides backup, any IT division should have a disaster recovery plan. You will find a few tips below relating to the development of such a plan and to what issues one should pay special attention in the course of backup planning.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

NTFS file system has been developed by Microsoft that is widely used by Windows NT operating system and its advanced versions. It is the mostly used over FAT file system as it provides superior features like reliability, security, storage, efficienc…
I was prompted to write this article after the recent World-Wide Ransomware outbreak. For years now, System Administrators around the world have used the excuse of "Waiting a Bit" before applying Security Patch Updates. This type of reasoning to me …
In an interesting question (https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/29008360/) here at Experts Exchange, a member asked how to split a single image into multiple images. The primary usage for this is to place many photographs on a flatbed scanner…

734 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question