Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 208
  • Last Modified:

thread problem

 i am having a problem with NOTIFY and WAIT. when i create a thread using :
    new ABC().start() ... where ABC class extends Thread.i guess since i am always doing NEW of ABC() for all threads a new instance variable is declared .... so i gues my NOTIFY and WAIT doesn't work .... my NOTIFY and WAIT WORK when i create only one RUNNABLE object and pass the same object to all the threads.
 Now i have figured out that if i create only one instance of Runnable object (i.e ABC() implements Runnable) .... my notify and wait works fine since all the thread share same instance variable and i can lock and realease on the ONLY instace that is shared by all the threads.
 But i have a problem here ... now if i wanna set a parameter for each thread like : new ABC(params ..) ... i will have to do NEW ABC() everythime and i guess my notify and wait will NOT WORK ...

Help please

  • 2
  • 2
1 Solution
on which object do you wait() and notify()?

why not create a
static Object notifier = new Object();

to have one instance for all ob your Abc Threads to wait on?
From your description, it is not clear that you even need wait/notify synchronization. Synchronization is a methodology that is used to coordinate access by multiple threads to a SHARED resource. As long as your mulitple threads are all using their own (instance) variables, there is no need to synchronize, because they cannot interfere with each other. Again, it is only when there are multiple threads that are all trying to manipulate a single shared variable (or other resource) that there can be a problem which would require synchronization to solve. An instance variable (for instance) is not shared among threads. A static variable (on the other hand) could be.

Perhaps an example of your code would help to clarify things.

ADMINISTRATION WILL BE CONTACTING YOU SHORTLY.  Moderators Computer101 or Netminder will return to finalize these if still open in seven days.  Please post closing recommendations before that time.

Question(s) below appears to have been abandoned. Your options are:
1. Accept a Comment As Answer (use the button next to the Expert's name).
2. Close the question if the information was not useful to you, but may help others. You must tell the participants why you wish to do this, and allow for Expert response.  This choice will include a refund to you, and will move this question to our PAQ (Previously Asked Question) database.  If you found information outside this question thread, please add it.
3. Ask Community Support to help split points between participating experts, or just comment here with details and we'll respond with the process.
4. Delete the question (if it has no potential value for others).
   --> Post comments for expert of your intention to delete and why
   --> YOU CANNOT DELETE A QUESTION with comments; special handling by a Moderator is required.

For special handling needs, please post a zero point question in the link below and include the URL (question QID/link) that it regards with details.
Please click this link for Help Desk, Guidelines/Member Agreement and the Question/Answer process.

Click you Member Profile to view your question history and please keep them updated. If you are a KnowledgePro user, use the Power Search option to find them.  

Questions which are LOCKED with a Proposed Answer but do not help you, should be rejected with comments added.  When you grade the question less than an A, please comment as to why.  This helps all involved, as well as others who may access this item in the future.  PLEASE DO NOT AWARD POINTS TO ME.

To view your open questions, please click the following link(s) and keep them all current with updates.

To view your locked questions, please click the following link(s) and evaluate the proposed answer.

*****  E X P E R T S    P L E A S E  ******  Leave your closing recommendations if this item remains inactive another seven (7) days.  If you are interested in the cleanup effort, please click this link 
POINTS FOR EXPERTS awaiting comments are listed here ->
Moderators will finalize this question if in @7 days Asker has not responded.  This will be moved to the PAQ (Previously Asked Questions) at zero points, deleted or awarded.
Thank you everyone.
Moderator @ Experts Exchange
I doubt either of us provided any actual information. I was mostly fishing around trying to solicit some response that would clarify the problem. teast is also obviously guessing.
Without Asker's participation in his/her own question, this is tough.  Points refunded, item closed.  I very much appreciate the expert help here, and am always saddened when help is requested/given and then .... nothing....
Moondancer - EE Moderator
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Get your problem seen by more experts

Be seen. Boost your question’s priority for more expert views and faster solutions

  • 2
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now