Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of jsmurf
jsmurf

asked on

33.6K modem on a 486 sx-33.

Someone gave a lady in our church a 486 sx-33 gateway at 16k running Windows 95. I have tried to put a Practical 33.6k modem in the machine to run Juno 4.0 e-mail. It is an isa moden-half card. The machine recognizes the modem and Juno claims that it sees the modem but I cannot get Juno to update the acces numbers which is required to first run the e-mail. Can a 33.6k modem be run by a 486 sx-33 or is the machine too slow?
Avatar of rid
rid
Flag of Sierra Leone image

Machine speed is more than enough. The bottleneck is almost always the so called UART circuit (universal asynchronous receiver-transmitter), but this should reside on the modem card itself and couldn't possibly be a problem as far as modem speed is concerned. This is a general comment. The access number you mention is a concept unknown to me. If you cannot get the modem to work at all, there may be a resources conflict. This cannot be seen from the info provided though.
Regards
/RID
Avatar of pete1968_be
pete1968_be

Hi,
You might try to see if the modem reacts when you go to control panel/modem/diagnostics/querie, if that works you already have a clue that it is functional.
Then you can check if it can connect to the internet via a known working account.
By the accessnumber you are talking about, is that the phone number, the loggin name or what ?

Greetz,

Pete
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of jhance
jhance

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of jsmurf

ASKER

Juno requires one to get local access numbers before using the e-mail. When the modem tries to dail a 800 number to access the numbers, Juno says that the modem is not available. The W95 systems says the modm is installed and working properly.
If UART is not at least 16550 you should buy a board that will boost the speed up to that.  Mine cost $18.  It has a lot of other features that I can't get to work, but the comm port at 16550 works great.
> If UART is not at least 16550

Q: Is there any ISA-interface 33600 modem which does *NOT* have the 16550 UART as part of its hardware?
A: Possibly, a US Robotics "winmodem".
But, since this modem is a Practical Peripherals modem,
it is not a "winmodem" -- the P.P. modem is a "hardware" modem, which works fine with any speed of 486.

Start HyperTerminal, and "send" the strings:

  AT&F  (return)

and

  ATD  (return)

to the modem.  The first response should be 'OK'.
The second response should be 'OK', followed
by the sound of the "dial-tone".
Tell us what you see & hear.
The modem in Q is an internal, isn't it. Being ISA, I mean. I don't think this is hardware related.
Regards
/RID
Hello everyone,

This question has been open for quite awhile. I am going to allow feedback from the questioner and experts. If it is not resolved, I will delete or accept an answer based on the info I have been given. Experts, feel free to offer input. I will monitor this question for a period of 5-7 days and come back and evaluate.  

I reserve the right to disallow any comments that may not have a direct conclusion

Thank you,
ComTech
Community Support Moderator

*Question Author, please return and resolve this question.*
>>I reserve the right to disallow any comments that may not have a direct conclusion

Even if you did not reserve this right, would that change anything?
Questioning my motives changes things.  This line suggested and added will result in less controversy.
Avatar of jsmurf

ASKER

It was probably a Juno problem. After several weeks of trying to get the numbers, I tried early in the morning and went right through. I think Juno is trying to discourage people from using the free service by making it so diffucult to get started and connected.