• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 733
  • Last Modified:

Aggregation in ATL

G'day, I'm back with (yet) another question on ATL.  I need to create an interface that aggregates another component.  Further more, I want this new interface to be a union of the inner interface and the outer.

Here's what I've got (some code removed for brevity):
--------------------------------------
interface IInnerObject : IDispatch
{
[id(1), helpstring("method Inner1")] HRESULT Inner1();
[id(2), helpstring("method Inner2")] HRESULT Inner2();
};

interface IOuter : IDispatch
{
[id(3), helpstring("method Outer1")] HRESULT Outer1();
};
// Extra code omitted

coclass InnerObject
{
[default] interface IInnerObject;
};

coclass Outer
{
[default] interface IOuter;
interface IInnerObject;
};
--------------------------------------
// COuter.h

BEGIN_COM_MAP(COuter)
     COM_INTERFACE_ENTRY(IOuter)
     COM_INTERFACE_ENTRY(IDispatch)
     COM_INTERFACE_ENTRY_AGGREGATE_BLIND(m_pAgg.p)
END_COM_MAP()

I've also overloaded FinalConstruct and FinalRelease to export the inner interface.  My test app (in VB) can see both interfaces just fine, though they are exposed as two interfaces, and not a union of the two.
0
InetMatt
Asked:
InetMatt
1 Solution
 
snoeglerCommented:
>> , though they are exposed as two interfaces, and not a union of the two.
which is correct & expected behavior for aggregation ...

If you want to 'unify' two interfaces you must define a new interface which forwards the methods to the contained interfaces.
Suppose you have IFoo and IBar. How would you expect the 'unified' interface to appear to COM? As IFooBar? As IBarFoo :)
0
 
ccaprarCommented:
If you want to expose a single interface, just define your IOuter interface to contain the union of IInnerObject methods and the new methods specific to IOuter. In the methods of IOuter that correspond to IInnerObject, forward the request to the inner object method. And remove the macro COM_INTERFACE_ENTRY_AGGREGATE_BLIND from your COM MAP. Of course, you should create the inner object in your FinalConstruct and destroy in FinalRelease :)
0
 
griesshCommented:
I think you forgot this question. I will ask Community Support to close it unless you finalize it within 7 days. Unless there is objection or further activity,  I will suggest to accept "snoegler, ccaprar" comment(s) as an answer.

If you think your question was not answered at all, you can post a request in Community support (please include this link) to refund your points.
The link to the Community Support area is: http://www.experts-exchange.com/jsp/qList.jsp?ta=commspt

PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER!
======
Werner
0
 
NetminderCommented:
Per recommendation comment force/accepted by

Netminder
Community Support Moderator
Experts Exchange

snoegler: points for you at http://experts-exchange.com/jsp/qShow.jsp?ta=cplusprog&qid=20278069
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Get expert help—faster!

Need expert help—fast? Use the Help Bell for personalized assistance getting answers to your important questions.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now