Solved

Threadsafe function

Posted on 2001-07-11
3
161 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-04
Lets say I have a simple function which don't interacts with the VCL, e.g. adding two numbers.
If I call this function the same time from two threads, would that cause an error.
Would it make a differens if the function creates an local object and frees it after use. Then two objects should be created I guess.

Please higher my thread knowledge :)
0
Comment
Question by:koger
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
3 Comments
 
LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:Epsylon
ID: 6274999
You can call the same function from 2 different threads as long as the function is thread-safe. Functions like Pos(), IntToStr() and Length() are safe. The same counts for Objects. Each thread can create its own objects. E.g. TStringlist and TMemoryStream.
0
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:alx512
ID: 6275785
Use threadvar directive instead of var.
A thread-local variable is like a global variable, except that each thread of execution gets its own private copy of the variable, which cannot be accessed from other threads.

Thread-variable declarations
  cannot occur within a procedure or function.
  cannot include initializations.
  cannot specify the absolute directive.

Reference-counted variables (such as long strings, dynamic arrays, or interfaces) are not thread-safe, even if they are declared with threadvar. Do not use dynamic thread variables, since there is in general no way to free the heap-allocated memory created by each thread of execution. Finally, do not create pointer- or procedural-type thread variables.
0
 
LVL 20

Accepted Solution

by:
Madshi earned 50 total points
ID: 6275903
alx512 is right, but only if you need something like global variables. THEN threadvar is one solution, and THEN dynamic reference-counted variables are not thread safe in the meaning, that threadvar don't secure them automatically.
If you need global variables, you can also not use threadvar, but normal global variables and secure them with e.g. critical sections. In that case you can also use dynamic reference-counted variables. Of course its more work than threadvars, because you have to secure the access to the variables yourself.

But I think koger was only talking about local variables, and there you can use whatever you like, it's all thread safe. Epsylon is right there. Also you can let 1000 threads run the same code at the same time, no problem at all... Look, in win9x the system dlls are all shared between all processes. Nevertheless all threads can theoretically run through the system APIs at the same time, no problem. Each thread has its own stack and its own code pointer.

Regards, Madshi.
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: ZipGrep

ZipGrep is a utility that can list and search zip (.war, .ear, .jar, etc) archives for text patterns, without the need to extract the archive's contents.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way to say thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Have you ever had your Delphi form/application just hanging while waiting for data to load? This is the article to read if you want to learn some things about adding threads for data loading in the background. First, I'll setup a general applica…
Hello everybody This Article will show you how to validate number with TEdit control, What's the TEdit control? TEdit is a standard Windows edit control on a form, it allows to user to write, read and copy/paste single line of text. Usua…

734 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question