?
Solved

VPN's and 2-way satellite connections

Posted on 2001-08-03
3
Medium Priority
?
442 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-12
Can someone explain to me the implications of static v. dynamic IP addresses on broadband satellite solutions?  Also, I know there is an issue with running a "tunnel within a tunnel" but don't fully comprehend the reasons behind it.  Are these two issues interrelated?  The land-based transmitter/receiver in a satellite connection actually uses a VPN to tunnel into the internet?  And because of this one cannot run a VPN across a two-way satellite connection ie.., a tunnel within a tunnel?
0
Comment
Question by:KlarkKent
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:chris_calabrese
ID: 6350436
Static vs. dynamic
o You can't setup an IPsec association if you don't know the IP address on the other side to set it up to.
o  You can't host (web,ftp,email,whatever) services if you don't have a nailed down IP to talk to (well, OK, you could solve this with DDNS, but it's easier to get a nailed IP).

Tunnel within a tunel:
IPsec fully encapsulates whatever it sees, including more IPsec, so there's no particular reason this shoulnd't work as long as...
o You're actually using encapsulation mode (as opposed to Authentication Header mode, since then you don't get encapsulation)
o Your applications can deal properly with the packet length overhead of the extra tunnel.
o Your applications can deal with the performance overhead of double encryption.
o The tunnel doesn't also NAT (IPsec doesn't like NAT).
0
 

Author Comment

by:KlarkKent
ID: 6355990
Ok, so let me see if I understand.  

Static v. Dynamic:  If a network uses DHCP it makes it tougher to set up IPsec within a broadband connection, or any connection really.

Tunnel within a tunnel:  Would both tunnels need to use encapsulation mode or just the "outer" tunnel?  Same question for NAT, would it need to be avoided simply on the broadband provider's end or on both.  
0
 
LVL 14

Accepted Solution

by:
chris_calabrese earned 150 total points
ID: 6356184
Static v. Dynamic: Yes, that's the idea.

Tunnel wihin a tunnel: Yes, just the outer tunnel.

NAT: Both ends.
0

Featured Post

Need protection from advanced malware attacks?

Look no further than WatchGuard's Total Security Suite, providing defense in depth against today's most headlining attacks like Petya 2.0 and WannaCry. Keep your organization out of the news with protection from known and unknown threats.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Some of you may have heard that SonicWALL has finally released an app for iOS devices giving us long awaited connectivity for our iPhone's, iPod's, and iPad's. This guide is just a quick rundown on how to get up and running quickly using the app. …
If you use NetMotion Mobility on your PC and plan to upgrade to Windows 10, it may not work unless you take these steps.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
Windows 10 is mostly good. However the one thing that annoys me is how many clicks you have to do to dial a VPN connection. You have to go to settings from the start menu, (2 clicks), Network and Internet (1 click), Click VPN (another click) then fi…
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month10 days, 18 hours left to enroll

770 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question