[Last Call] Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
?
Solved

Minimizing  Appletalk

Posted on 2001-08-07
5
Medium Priority
?
353 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-13
Currently I have 150 systems on my network.40 of those systems are Macintosh. I am trying to find a solution to segment the appletalk protocol and still have the Macintoshs be able to access files and print from my NT/2000 servers.
I have already tried ExtremeZ-ip and dave client but they still fail at minimizing appletalk on the network.

What avalible solutions does anyone have that I can try?

I have 5 NT\2000 servers the macs access.



Thx


0
Comment
Question by:chadoz
5 Comments
 
LVL 63

Expert Comment

by:SysExpert
ID: 6361839
I would add a second NIC on your server and have it dedicated for appletalk only.

I hope this helps !
0
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:krytical
ID: 6362370
chadoz,

Are these MACs on the same network segment now, and your just trying to limit its damage on network performance? If so, would a small router be in the budget to put in the path between the Macs and the rest of the network? This would increase the network proformance, since the constant broadcasts given by Appletalk would be stopped at the router, but of course still allow the Macs to communicate with the rest of the network. Just an idea...
0
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:jwalsh88
ID: 6362432
It sounds like you only want the appletalk protocol on one segment , but you want that segment able to talk with another segment using TCP/IP?  If that's right , the only way I know how is with a router.  It will route the TCP/IP packets but not the Appletalk.  Any device you need will have to be layer 3 so it will need a router.  ofcourse, you could use a server as the router.  It will only route the TCP/IP traffic, I don't recommend that, but if money is very tight then you really have no choice.
0
 
LVL 79

Expert Comment

by:lrmoore
ID: 9017198
chadoz,
No comment has been added lately (719 days), so it's time to clean up this TA.
I will leave a recommendation in the Cleanup topic area for this question:

RECOMMENDATION: PAQ/No Refund

Please leave any comments here within 7 days.

-- Please DO NOT accept this comment as an answer ! --

Thanks,

lrmoore
EE Cleanup Volunteer
0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
YensidMod earned 0 total points
ID: 9114872
Question is PAQ'd and no points refunded.

YensidMod
Community Support Moderator @Experts Exchange
0

Featured Post

Get your Conversational Ransomware Defense e‑book

This e-book gives you an insight into the ransomware threat and reviews the fundamentals of top-notch ransomware preparedness and recovery. To help you protect yourself and your organization. The initial infection may be inevitable, so the best protection is to be fully prepared.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article is in regards to the Cisco QSFP-4SFP10G-CU1M cables, which are designed to uplink/downlink 40GB ports to 10GB SFP ports. I recently experienced this and found very little configuration documentation on how these are supposed to be confi…
Unable to change the program that handles the scan event from a network attached Canon/Brother printer/scanner. This means you'll always have to choose which program handles this action, e.g. ControlCenter4 (in the case of a Brother).
Internet Business Fax to Email Made Easy - With  eFax Corporate (http://www.enterprise.efax.com), you'll receive a dedicated online fax number, which is used the same way as a typical analog fax number. You'll receive secure faxes in your email, f…
There's a multitude of different network monitoring solutions out there, and you're probably wondering what makes NetCrunch so special. It's completely agentless, but does let you create an agent, if you desire. It offers powerful scalability …

834 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question