e_s_mahesh
asked on
Netmeeting with checkpoint VPN
I have Checkpoint VPN with IP Nat pool and i want to configure netmeeting for VPN clients.
When i configure netmeeting, the clients tries to connect to real ip address rather that its nated IP address.
When i configure netmeeting, the clients tries to connect to real ip address rather that its nated IP address.
NetMeeting does not work with NAT because it places the real IP address into the client data packets.
ASKER
Thats right but checkpoint says they have some code written in inspection language which solves this problem.
OK, I hate to do this... but did you install/enable that code?
ASKER
Yes and its not working.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
I agree - checkpoint costs an arm and a leg - make them solve this one.
(Or you could dump checkpoint (a pile of crap IMO), and do the same things with linux (which *does* have a netmeeting proxy that costs about $50 [and works like a charm - even has a web gui to configure it]) - much cheaper than checkpoint, and infinitely more financailly scalable)
-Jon
(Or you could dump checkpoint (a pile of crap IMO), and do the same things with linux (which *does* have a netmeeting proxy that costs about $50 [and works like a charm - even has a web gui to configure it]) - much cheaper than checkpoint, and infinitely more financailly scalable)
-Jon
This is what checkpoint supports says on the matter;
Upgrade to VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 SP2.
See the version 4.1 SP2 release notes for instructions about editing to the $FWDIR/lib/user.def and for the creation of the required new H323 service
Hope it helps
Upgrade to VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 SP2.
See the version 4.1 SP2 release notes for instructions about editing to the $FWDIR/lib/user.def and for the creation of the required new H323 service
Hope it helps
No comment has been added lately, so it's time to clean up this TA.
I will leave a recommendation in the Cleanup topic area that this question:
I recommend: points to UkWizard
if there is any objection or other expert commentary to this recommendation then please post in here within 7 days.
If you feel that your question was not properly addressed, or that none of the comments received were appropriate answers, please post a request in Community support (with a link to this page) to refund your points. https://www.experts-exchange.com/Community_Support/
PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER!
thanks,
lrmoore
EE Cleanup Volunteer
---------------------
I will leave a recommendation in the Cleanup topic area that this question:
I recommend: points to UkWizard
if there is any objection or other expert commentary to this recommendation then please post in here within 7 days.
If you feel that your question was not properly addressed, or that none of the comments received were appropriate answers, please post a request in Community support (with a link to this page) to refund your points. https://www.experts-exchange.com/Community_Support/
PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER!
thanks,
lrmoore
EE Cleanup Volunteer
---------------------
I recommend a split between UK and chris - chris was first to suggest asking checkpoint, but UK was the first to actually ask Checkpoint.
lrmoore - don't you hate <word edited by SpideyMod> like the original poster here (I understand if you cannot express public agreement with me here)? Logged in to ask one single question eons ago, and then never bothered to follow up or remove his acct since he didn't immediately get the response he was looking for, and in fact never apparently used EE again. Makes me wish I could reach into my data connection and have my hand pop out the other end, ready to strangle the guy about the throat. I only pray he is still receiving email notifs on this so he sees this comment (but I know that's a pipe dream).
Some folks have no respect.
In any case, I know situations like this must be rather annoying - keep up the excellent work!
Cheers,
-Jon
lrmoore - don't you hate <word edited by SpideyMod> like the original poster here (I understand if you cannot express public agreement with me here)? Logged in to ask one single question eons ago, and then never bothered to follow up or remove his acct since he didn't immediately get the response he was looking for, and in fact never apparently used EE again. Makes me wish I could reach into my data connection and have my hand pop out the other end, ready to strangle the guy about the throat. I only pray he is still receiving email notifs on this so he sees this comment (but I know that's a pipe dream).
Some folks have no respect.
In any case, I know situations like this must be rather annoying - keep up the excellent work!
Cheers,
-Jon
Answered by chris_calabrese
SpideyMod
Community Support Moderator @Experts Exchange
Typically we don't split points under the following conditions:
1) When the net result would be less than 50 points per expert
2) When the same information is provided by two or more experts...the questioner could have obtained that same informaion by doing what chris suggested.
The--Captain - I have edited your last statement. Let's keep things professional in the technical TAs. There is a place on EE to do this kind of complaining which is much more loose in terms of language. It is the lounge. Check it out some time...you will find quite a few folks that will share your point of view on this issue.
SpideyMod
Community Support Moderator @Experts Exchange
Typically we don't split points under the following conditions:
1) When the net result would be less than 50 points per expert
2) When the same information is provided by two or more experts...the questioner could have obtained that same informaion by doing what chris suggested.
The--Captain - I have edited your last statement. Let's keep things professional in the technical TAs. There is a place on EE to do this kind of complaining which is much more loose in terms of language. It is the lounge. Check it out some time...you will find quite a few folks that will share your point of view on this issue.