[Okta Webinar] Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 158
  • Last Modified:

ADO Windows 98 vs Windows NT

I have developed an application using ADO 2.6 connecting to a Oracle 8i database.  The same code executing on Windows NT takes less time to update the database than when using Windows 98.  I am using the Microsoft for Oracle ODBC driver.  Does anyone know of any major perfomance differences with the Microsoft for Oracle driver in 95/98 vs the NT driver?  Or has anyone experience this performance hit?
0
RJOHNS621
Asked:
RJOHNS621
1 Solution
 
DreamMasterCommented:
I have never actually tested the difference in time executing on Windows 98 or Windows NT...

But it does sound logical that Windows NT runs faster with things like this then Windows 98 does...simply because Windows 98 wasn't designed to handle server stuff..

Max.
0
 
wsh2Commented:
I suspect your NT machine is just better endowed with hardware resources.. (ie. Network Card, Memory, and/or Processor).. than the non-NT machine; as the code you are running is the same on both machines.
0
 
RJOHNS621Author Commented:
Actually, the Windows 98 machine has more memory and a faster processor than the Windows NT machine
0
Concerto Cloud for Software Providers & ISVs

Can Concerto Cloud Services help you focus on evolving your application offerings, while delivering the best cloud experience to your customers? From DevOps to revenue models and customer support, the answer is yes!

Learn how Concerto can help you.

 
eeevansCommented:
I would suspect the increased time on the Win 98 machine has more to do with Win NT having a better TCPIP stack and memory management than Win 98.  Depending on how much data is being updated and what kind of process is used to update them (ie. a single SQL query vs. a separate one for each record) then the memory management and the network traffic become more of a factor.  I'm not aware of any inherent performance differences in the driver based on the operating system other than the differences internal to the Op Sys's.  I've seen huge performance differences with Win 95 vs. Win NT on the same base system with users performing the same tasks.  Throwing memory at the Win 95 systems does help but still doesn't equal the Win NT machines.

Regards,

eeevans

0
 
DreamMasterCommented:
0
 
DreamMasterCommented:
Which is what I said before...

Windows NT is just a better platform for such programs...

Max.
0
 
inthedarkCommented:
RJOHNS621, I suspect that the speed difference is because many systems these days have multi-processor cpu's. e.g. PII=2 CPU's and PIII = 3 CPU's.

NT Is able to assign a task to a specific CPU but 98 is not able to do this.  In fact, before you run a program on your system, there are already a whole bunch of other things running already; device drivers, clocks, virus scans, volume controls, etc.... Just press CTRL/ALT/DEL and view the NT task monitor.  So if a system can divide its tasks it must be able to run faster. This is the reason, but I could be wrong.


0
 
RJOHNS621Author Commented:
Thank you for your comments.  Your explanation was right on target with my line of thinking.  I just really did not have any other test to back it up.  Thanks again
0

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now