Solved

Share Overhead vs DFS

Posted on 2001-09-11
6
599 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-28
Currently in order to map users to their own home folder on an NT server I have to create a share for each user e.g. Home-John.
Now that there are 60 - 70 users I am concerned about the overhead on the server running so many shares.

Reading documentation on KiXtart I have discovered the following:
The Windows redirector software on Windows 9x systems does not support the concept of socalled ?deep? redirections (ie: redirecting a drive to a directory below the sharelevel, eg: ?\\SERVER\SHARE\USER?). As such, Novell?s MAP ROOT feature cannot be emulated
Deep redirections are possible on Windows NT systems, either by using the SUBST command, or by installing the Distributed FileSystem (DFS) client software.

The SUBST does not work for Networked drives.

HERE IS THE QUESTION
Is DFS a viable solution or would I be swapping one problem for another.
0
Comment
Question by:Roys
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:ajprice
ID: 6474495
This isn't really answering your DFS questios,
but a suggestion none the less.  

Why not just
create a share named "Users" map to that, and
have their home directories nested under there...
only one share being advertised then.  Unless
you're using roaming profiles I wouldn't see
any problems.
0
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:ajprice
ID: 6474548
A little more input.  I just realized my answer was already nullified by your original question.  

Something else to think about though, unless you're running 2000, you won't be able to use Dfs.  I'm just about 99% sure on that one, unless there are some utilities that I haven't seen yet which is entirely possible.


Second, DFS is going to create it's own replication topology between it's replica members, and you can't see it or alter it.  It uses NT's replication method so it's only going to replicate changes... but with users directories, that's going to be a whole lot of changes replicating back and forth.  Big Repl-fest.

If you're worried about system resources, I'd stick with the shares.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Roys
ID: 6474582
Thought DFS was a non starter,
Any thoughts on alternate methods for MAP ROOT type functionality
0
Don't lose your head updating email signatures!

Do your end users still have the wrong email signature? Do email signature updates bore you or fill you with a sense of dread? You can make this a whole lot easier on yourself by trusting an Exclaimer email signature management solution. Over 50 million users do...so should you!

 
LVL 1

Accepted Solution

by:
ajprice earned 200 total points
ID: 6474591
Not real familiar with writing scripts.  I have just used the map function under User Manager for Domains seemed to work just fine.
0
 
LVL 63

Expert Comment

by:SysExpert
ID: 6474734
To solve this you need a tool like the free scripting tool MS recommenbds-

http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q162/7/93.ASP  username Home directory for win9x kixtart


Kixtart :

Here's a few, you can also get a bit of info from the NT res.kit.
 
 http://netnet.net/~swilson/kix/
   http://kixtart.org/
  http://kixtart.org/helpdesk/
                              http://www.hockey.net/~kevinv/kixtart/index.shtml 
                            http://www.kixtart.to/ 
                            http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q175/7/32.asp 
                            http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~orknorr/winkix.html 
                            http://davecentral.com/267.html 
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q162/7/93.ASP  username Home directory for win9x kixtart
------------
I hope this helps !
0
 

Author Comment

by:Roys
ID: 6474848
The original question was "Is DFS viable"

The answer appears to be that it is overkill for my required solution.

KiXtart cannot simulate the MAP ROOT type facility, There is not a method where a user can have their drive mapped to a lower level than the share.
The map is at the share level and from then on it must be NT permissions which allow/hide information.
0

Featured Post

Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

A few months ago I had an issue with LaserJet 1020 printer which was installed to XP and Windows 7.  It was installed to XP and working, but when I tried to connect from a Windows 7 PC, it would attempt connection and then fail.  Sometimes the Spool…
Sometimes drives fill up and we don't know why.  If you don't understand the best way to use the tools available, you may end up being stumped as to why your drive says it's not full when you have no space left!  Here's how you can find out...
This Micro Tutorial will give you a basic overview of Windows DVD Burner through its features and interface. This will be demonstrated using Windows 7 operating system.
Get a first impression of how PRTG looks and learn how it works.   This video is a short introduction to PRTG, as an initial overview or as a quick start for new PRTG users.

929 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

14 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now