Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people, just like you, are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
Solved

name service beside nis and nis+

Posted on 2001-09-12
7
322 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-27
Hi,
  I have around 50 servers to support and don't want to use nis nor nis+.  I would like certain users to use certain servers and admin to use secure servers.  Is there a software out there that allow me to sync all the password file on all servers beside nis and nis+?

thanks in advance
0
Comment
Question by:usaperl
  • 4
  • 2
7 Comments
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:filiep
ID: 6475990
If your are using Solaris 8, you can use LDAP

F.
0
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:chris_calabrese
ID: 6476821
That's true, but why don't you want to use NIS+?
It seems like it fits the bill quite nicely.
0
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:chris_calabrese
ID: 6476833
That's true, but why don't you want to use NIS+?
It seems like it fits the bill quite nicely.
0
Free Tool: Subnet Calculator

The subnet calculator helps you design networks by taking an IP address and network mask and returning information such as network, broadcast address, and host range.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

 

Author Comment

by:usaperl
ID: 6477853
no ldap, nis or nis+?
is there a software out there we can use to sync up the shadow file?
0
 
LVL 14

Accepted Solution

by:
chris_calabrese earned 100 total points
ID: 6479434
Yes, it's called NIS/NIS+.

Seriously, what's the unerlying issue here?  Is it security?  Administatibility?  Or FUD?

NIS is easy to admin, though not terribly secure.

NIS+ is pretty secure if setup properly, though harder to setup properly.
Similar for LDAP.

Meanwhile, another option is to have one system as the "master" and have it push out its password and shadow files to the slaves via rdist or rsync (preferably over  SSH).
0
 

Author Comment

by:usaperl
ID: 6480432
Ok.  I just push the shadow file then, but this does not solve the problem of allow only certain users to certain servers.

thanks
0
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:chris_calabrese
ID: 6480449
This will work the way you want if you have only certain people on in each password file but push out the whole shadow file.

But meanwhile, I still don't understand why you don't want to use NIS, NIS+, or LDAP.  This is exactly the type of problems they solve best.

0

Featured Post

Free Tool: SSL Checker

Scans your site and returns information about your SSL implementation and certificate. Helpful for debugging and validating your SSL configuration.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Attention: This article will no longer be maintained. If you have any questions, please feel free to mail me. jgh@FreeBSD.org Please see http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/freebsd-update-server/ for the updated article. It is avail…
When you do backups in the Solaris Operating System, the file system must be inactive. Otherwise, the output may be inconsistent. A file system is inactive when it's unmounted or it's write-locked by the operating system. Although the fssnap utility…
Learn how to get help with Linux/Unix bash shell commands. Use help to read help documents for built in bash shell commands.: Use man to interface with the online reference manuals for shell commands.: Use man to search man pages for unknown command…
In a previous video, we went over how to export a DynamoDB table into Amazon S3.  In this video, we show how to load the export from S3 into a DynamoDB table.

856 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question