‘Amazingly Protecting’ a non-thread safe non multi-instance static library

Hi,
I was supplied with a static library (lib which I do not have the source code for)
The library contains two methods:
A Set method & a Get method – the library is not multi-instance (I assume the variable being set or get is a global variable).

I then created a free-threaded com object (an ATL 7 attributed DLL containing a free threaded aggregated object).
I added 2 methods to the com object Set/Get each of these methods triggers the execution of the Set & Get methods of the static library (respectively).

I then wrote a tester which creates 2 instances of the com object.

Obj1,Obj1
It then performs Obj1->Set(1)
            Obj1->Set(2)
And runs an endless loop of
          Obj1->Get()
Obj2->Get()    

Both results of the Get methods are send to the output window using the ATLTRACE2 macro.

The amazing thing is – and finally here is my question – I get an endless output of 1 , 2 ,1 , 2 …
While what I expected would happen is an endless output of the number 1 OR the number 2 right after both of the Set methods where called.
(when I tried to code a similar library and use it the same way I did get the expected 1,2,1,1,1,1,1…)


Any ideas what is so special about this static library?
dr_mooAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
snoeglerConnect With a Mentor Commented:
I admit not having read your whole question, but i guess the answer is TLS.

If the lib uses global variables, they are put by default in a 'thread local storage'. This means, each thread uses its own instance of global variables from the point of view of the lib.

Cheers,
snoegler
0
 
jkrCommented:
snoegler seems to be right - try declaring the global variables as '__declspec(thread)', e.g.

// Example of the thread attribute
__declspec( thread ) int tls_i = 1;
0
 
DanRollinsCommented:
I'm not an expert on this, but I can't see how TLS can be relevant -- aren't both objects created and excuted on the same thread?

dr_moo:
Use DUMPBIN to examine that .lib file.  There moight be some clue there.

Does the Lib file access a DLL?  If so, it might be able to track which instance of that DLL is being used and use that as an index into a local lookup table.  I really have no details on how this would work, but it is a thought.

Have you given us all of the details?  Does the Lib really have only two exports (waht about some sort of "Open" or "Init" fn that prepares for subsequent Get and Set calls?)?  And do the Get and Set functions require only a single scalar parameter (you illistrate with an int).  If the Get and Set actually pass a structure or a class, then that data could contain a cookie of some sort to easily keep track of stateless details.

-- Dan
0
Cloud Class® Course: CompTIA Healthcare IT Tech

This course will help prep you to earn the CompTIA Healthcare IT Technician certification showing that you have the knowledge and skills needed to succeed in installing, managing, and troubleshooting IT systems in medical and clinical settings.

 
snoeglerCommented:
A free threaded object is created in the same thread as the caller. I assumed that his example created the two objets in two seperate threads (to test the free-threaded functionality). The behavior he mentions happens often in this context, so i just guessed :)
0
 
DanRollinsCommented:
hi dr_moo,
Do you have any additional questions?  Do any comments need clarification?

-- Dan
0
 
griesshCommented:
Dear dr_moo

I think you forgot this question. I will ask Community Support to close it unless you finalize it within 7 days. You can always request to keep this question open. But remember, experts can only help you if you provide feedback to their questions.
Unless there is objection or further activity,  I will suggest to accept

     "snoegler"

comment(s) as an answer.

If you think your question was not answered at all, you can post a request in Community support (please include this link) to refund your points. The link to the Community Support area is: http://www.experts-exchange.com/commspt/

PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER!
======
Werner
0
 
MindphaserCommented:
Force accepted

** Mindphaser - Community Support Moderator **
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.