Solved

PCI Ultra ATA Controller verse USB 2.0

Posted on 2002-03-08
6
330 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-09
PCI ultra ATA 133 controller card from PROMISE say the data transfer rate is 266MB/sec while USB 2.0 transfer is 480MB/sec. Does this means external HDD using USB 2.0 is faster ?

0
Comment
Question by:hhheng
6 Comments
 
LVL 16

Accepted Solution

by:
Kyle Schroeder earned 10 total points
ID: 6850459
Theoretically, yes...but in real life, probably not.  The 400 MB/sec is not technically correct, USB 2.0 has a (theoretical) maximum bandwidth of 400 Mega*BITS* (Mb, note small "b") per second, so its really only 50 MB/sec (8 bits in a Byte).  In real application, this 400Mb number is likely not possible to achieve.  Whats more important is the RPM factor of the drive; a 5400RPM internal drive *might* be beaten by a 7200RPM external USB2 drive.  There are other factors as well, including cache RAM size on the drive, GB/platter (data density), etc.

-dog*
0
 
LVL 32

Expert Comment

by:jhance
ID: 6850470
When drive manufacturers make "real" USB2.0 drives, then this will be possible.  But today, a USB external drive is just a plain old IDE drive in a USB enclosure.  

So regardless of how fast the USB interface is, the whole things CANNOT work faster than the speed of the drive in the box, which is likely to be ATA/100 but certainly no better than ATA/133.

Eventually, IDE will be dropped in favor of native USB interfaces on internal drives but I'm not aware of any on the market today.
0
 
LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:magarity
ID: 6851110
USB 2.0 transfers up to 420Mb/sec.  Just like a network transferring at 100Mb/sec, note the lowercase 'b', as in bits, as opposed to 266MB/sec, capital 'B' for bytes, for the ATA133.  If we divide 420 megabits by 8 to get bytes, we get a theoretical maximum of 52 megabytes.  However, this is throughput, not real world.

Discourse on minutiae:  USB is 'polled', so that the controller asks each device in turn it there is something to send (or demands the device receive).  When the device is transferring, the transfer time is a very limited length, as I recall it's 10 milliseconds.  Then the controller interrupts the transfer to go around and ask all the others if they need to send something.  If they do, they take their turns.  Even if there are no other devices, the controller has to ask the channel if there are any new devices it doesn't know about.  So the transfer is constantly being interrupted.  This is all opposed to an IDE/ATAPI device which can lock the bus and spam data as hard and fast as it can.  Keep in mind that the 266 figure quoted by the manufacturer is also a theoretical number and won't happen in the real world.

Anyway, just a couple of weeks ago, I got a new USB2.0 controller card and a couple of USB2.0 drive enclosures to test out.  The Fujitsu 20GB laptop sized drives transfer at 7.8MB/sec, sustained, according to SiSoft Sandra's disk benchmark test.  On USB1.1, the same drives transfer at 700KB/sec.  7.8 is not at all bad and perfectly usable as a secondary drive to a laptop or even backup storage for a desktop.  In these days of cheap 30MB/sec ATA100, 7.8 may sound sucky, but it depends on where and doing what.

regards,
magarity
0
VMware Disaster Recovery and Data Protection

In this expert guide, you’ll learn about the components of a Modern Data Center. You will use cases for the value-added capabilities of Veeam®, including combining backup and replication for VMware disaster recovery and using replication for data center migration.

 

Author Comment

by:hhheng
ID: 6852044
So USB2 drive is actual transferring data at about 52 megabytes/second. As compare to PCI controller card at 266 megabytes/second. This a lot of difference between 52MB and 266MB despite the fact that both are using PCI cards. The difference, I reckon that PCI controller card uses a 80 wire cable which is better than USB2 4 wire cable.

So the right answer is PCI connected HDD is faster than USB2.0 external HDD, if considering all factors are the same ( cache RAM, rpm,etc )

I've lost some screws in my head and now afraid to award points. What interest me most is reading all the comments which provide me with lots of informations/knowledge with intangible value. Like "magarity" despite labelling me as a jerk has given a very lenghty techno-savvy comment. The mild and meek "jhance" who was angered by me for giving points to a "copy-cat" answer. And "dogztar" whom I made uncalled remarks has come out to help me again.

Can some EE moderator help out here in awarding the points.

Regards & cheers..
Heng



0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:Kyle Schroeder
ID: 6855754
jhance, mild and meek?!?!? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Heng...we are helping because that's what this place is about..its also a good opportunity to display technical knowledge amongst peers.  So we have let that other stuff go and are just trying to help (which is after all what we're doing here...)

But please, try to keep the personal comments to a minimum, or not at all, OK?

-dogztar
0
 

Author Comment

by:hhheng
ID: 6856202
"mild and meek" was first crooned by a "rose among the thorns" and now I realised this is true.

Hope a little itchy and bitchy comment didn't hurt that much. "David Letterman" does that all the time and the American audience loves that guy. HE HE HE HE HE

Cheers..
Heng
0

Featured Post

Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
strings to secure devices 8 77
100mbps vs. 100mbps on cat6e - Cable is 50m 6 67
Network Switches Keep Failing 8 70
PC build question 3 49
We recently endured a series of broadcast storms that caused our ISP to shut us down for brief periods of time. After going through a multitude of tests, we determined that the issue was related to Intel NIC drivers on some new HP desktop computers …
Moving your enterprise fax infrastructure from in-house fax machines and servers to the cloud makes sense — from both an efficiency and productivity standpoint. But does migrating to a cloud fax solution mean you will no longer be able to send or re…
This Micro Tutorial hows how you can integrate  Mac OSX to a Windows Active Directory Domain. Apple has made it easy to allow users to bind their macs to a windows domain with relative ease. The following video show how to bind OSX Mavericks to …
Internet Business Fax to Email Made Easy - With eFax Corporate (http://www.enterprise.efax.com), you'll receive a dedicated online fax number, which is used the same way as a typical analog fax number. You'll receive secure faxes in your email, fr…

867 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

18 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now