Solved

connection points and a VARIANT argument

Posted on 2002-04-10
4
363 Views
Last Modified: 2008-01-09
I have created a component that acquires data from some instrumentation. When the data acquisition is complete I want to notify the client of the component that the acquisition is complete. Using connection points, I pass the acquired data to the client using a multi-dimensional safe array in a VARIANT.  

Here is the interface definition;

...
...

dispinterface _ICamEvents
{
     properties:
     methods:
     [id(1), helpstring("waiting for external trigger")] HRESULT ExternalTrigger();
     [id(2), helpstring("data acquisition complete")] HRESULT AcquisitionComplete([in] VARIANT rawdata);
};

...
...


I compile the project with no problems. Then when I implement the connection point and compile I get the following eror messages;

d:\components\atdv420\atdv420cp.h(51) : warning C4305: 'argument' : truncation from 'struct tagVARIANT *' to 'bool'
        d:\components\atdv420\atdv420cp.h(35) : while compiling class-template member function 'long __thiscall CProxy_ICamEvents<class CDV420>::Fire_AcquisitionComplete(struct tagVARIANT)'
d:\components\atdv420\atdv420cp.h(51) : warning C4800: 'struct tagVARIANT *' : forcing value to bool 'true' or 'false' (performance warning)
        d:\components\atdv420\atdv420cp.h(35) : while compiling class-template member function 'long __thiscall CProxy_ICamEvents<class CDV420>::Fire_AcquisitionComplete(struct tagVARIANT)'


Here is the proxy generated code;


HRESULT Fire_AcquisitionComplete(VARIANT rawdata)
{
     CComVariant varResult;
     T* pT = static_cast<T*>(this);
     int nConnectionIndex;
     CComVariant* pvars = new CComVariant[1];
     int nConnections = m_vec.GetSize();
         
     for (nConnectionIndex = 0; nConnectionIndex < nConnections; nConnectionIndex++)
     {
          pT->Lock();
          CComPtr<IUnknown> sp = m_vec.GetAt(nConnectionIndex);
          pT->Unlock();
          IDispatch* pDispatch = reinterpret_cast<IDispatch*>(sp.p);
          if (pDispatch != NULL)
          {
               VariantClear(&varResult);
               pvars[0] = &rawdata;
               DISPPARAMS disp = { pvars, NULL, 1, 0 };
               pDispatch->Invoke(0x2, IID_NULL, LOCALE_USER_DEFAULT, DISPATCH_METHOD, &disp, &varResult, NULL, NULL);
          }
     }
     delete[] pvars;
     return varResult.scode;
}


If I change the line of code from

pvars[0] = &rawdata;

to the following;

pvars[0] = rawdata;

Everything works fine and I can access the data from the client. Am I doing something wrong or is this an error with the proxy generator?
0
Comment
Question by:johndixson
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 3

Accepted Solution

by:
job_s earned 200 total points
ID: 6933468
You are right .That is the problem of the proxy code generator.

CComVariant class only supports these types as RHS for = operator

If we give as &Variant it will treat as a bool

note no *VARIANT

CComVariant& operator =( const CComVariant& varSrc );
CComVariant& operator =( const VARIANT& varSrc );
CComVariant& operator =( LPCOLESTR lpsz );
CComVariant& operator =( LPCSTR lpsz );
CComVariant& operator =( BSTR bstrSrc );
CComVariant& operator =( bool bSrc );
CComVariant& operator =( int nSrc );
CComVariant& operator =( BYTE nSrc );
CComVariant& operator =( short nSrc );
CComVariant& operator =( long nSrc );
CComVariant& operator =( float nSrc );
CComVariant& operator =( double nSrc );
CComVariant& operator =( CY cySrc );
CComVariant& operator =( IDispatch* pSrc );
CComVariant& operator =( IUnknown* pSrc );

0
 

Author Comment

by:johndixson
ID: 6933978
Does this mean it's invalid to modify the code? Or it this acceptable?
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:job_s
ID: 6933985
I mean Ur right.U must modify the code to work it correctly.
0
 

Author Comment

by:johndixson
ID: 6933997
Thanks, it just adds a little uncertainty to an already complex problem!
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Subnet Calculator

The subnet calculator helps you design networks by taking an IP address and network mask and returning information such as network, broadcast address, and host range.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Article by: SunnyDark
This article's goal is to present you with an easy to use XML wrapper for C++ and also present some interesting techniques that you might use with MS C++. The reason I built this class is to ease the pain of using XML files with C++, since there is…
Introduction This article is the first in a series of articles about the C/C++ Visual Studio Express debugger.  It provides a quick start guide in using the debugger. Part 2 focuses on additional topics in breakpoints.  Lastly, Part 3 focuses on th…
The goal of the video will be to teach the user the concept of local variables and scope. An example of a locally defined variable will be given as well as an explanation of what scope is in C++. The local variable and concept of scope will be relat…
The goal of the video will be to teach the user the difference and consequence of passing data by value vs passing data by reference in C++. An example of passing data by value as well as an example of passing data by reference will be be given. Bot…

738 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question