execute command recursively in subdirs

How can I rename alle files named "*.x" to "*.y" in all subdirs?

I'm looking for a general solution!
I know mmv - but I don't know, if I could use it here.

a solution would be a command that executes the same command in every subdir ...

so I would call:
run_rec mmv "*.x" "#1.y"

thanks
michi
LVL 1
wittyAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
The--CaptainConnect With a Mentor Commented:
I think I know what you're saying - you want to just be able to run a cmdline within each directory recursively?

Why not:


#!/bin/bash
find -type d | awk "{print \"export STCD=`pwd` ; cd \" \$0 \" ; $1 ; cd $STCD\"}" | sh -x

Just use the first argument as the command to run and it will run it in every directory recursively - don't forget the quotes if your cmdline has spaces in it...

I called the script rec_cmd and typed:

rec_cmd "touch 'my balls'"

and 'my balls' appeared in every directory recursively...

-Jon

0
 
ahoffmannCommented:
find ./ -name "*.x" | xargs -i basename {} ".x" | xargs -i mv {}.x {}.y
# or a more UNIXisch solution
find ./ -name \*.x | sed -e 's/\(.*\)\.x/mv & \1.y/'|sh
0
 
wittyAuthor Commented:
well, this is exactly, what I do all the time - but there must exist some better solution - more related to recursivity!!!

thanks
witty
0
Cloud Class® Course: Microsoft Office 2010

This course will introduce you to the interfaces and features of Microsoft Office 2010 Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and Access. You will learn about the features that are shared between all products in the Office suite, as well as the new features that are product specific.

 
ahoffmannCommented:
KISS - keep it small and simple

why do you warry about the find command? It does exactly what you asked for, not more and not less, exactly.
This with just a few key hits, if you do it recursively you need a script/program with a few hundred bytes. Why?
Find still is recursively, somehow.
An d with a simple  -type f  you can restrict to files. What do you need more?
0
 
wittyAuthor Commented:
I know what you mean - but there MUST exist something without "find -exec" or "xargs"!

nevertheless your command-line wouldn't work (the pwd doesn't change) :-)

thanks
michi
0
 
ahoffmannCommented:
> .. MUST exist ..
well, replace find by
    ls -lR
but it's slower, not as flexible etc. etc.
Still do not understand why you need to make things more complicated.

> .. your command-line wouldn't work ..
which did not work?
what did not work?
what is the problem?
both work for me since years, 1'st one only if there is a basename, 2'nd on any UNIX I've ever seen
Keep in mind, that depending on your shell you need to quote parameters and/or escape some special charactzers.

> ..(the pwd doesn't change)
true. Why should it change? There is no reason for it (it just wastes time, or think of directories which a links:)

I gave you 2 perfect solutions to your question, either accept them or give a detailled description with example what you want to do.
0
 
wittyAuthor Commented:
ok - why the first line doesn't work:

"basename" is the name without directory.
so the "mv"-command can't work, because it won't find a file with this name in the current directory (because it is in a subdir!)!

and why I don't like it:
xargs is sooo slow, if you have a lot of (and I mean A LOT OF) files!!!

thanks though
michi
0
 
ahoffmannCommented:
agree, basename is not for recursive use, sorry didn't test again.
Did you try my 2'nd example? Probably, depending on shell and/or sed version, needs to be changed to:
  find ./ -name \*.x | sed -e 's#\(.*\)\.x#mv & \1.y#'|sh
0
 
The--CaptainCommented:
This may be easier to understand - always works for me

find -name "*.x" | sed -n -e 's/^\(.*\)\.x$/\1/p' | awk '{print "mv -f " $0 ".x " $0 ".y"}' | sh -x

-Jon
0
 
wittyAuthor Commented:
First of all: thanks to all your comments!

BUT:
these solution are all specific ones - the same I use today!!
(as you can read in my question) I'm looking for a *general solution* to do something like:
run_rec command -options parameters

thanks again
michi
0
 
CleanupPingCommented:
witty:
This old question needs to be finalized -- accept an answer, split points, or get a refund.  For information on your options, please click here-> http:/help/closing.jsp#1 
EXPERTS:
Post your closing recommendations!  No comment means you don't care.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.