Protecting some fields

I have a document in which a remark can be added by 3 people in 3 different fields.Now I want the comment added by 1 can be read by 2 and comment added by 2 can be read by 3 but not vice-versa.1 can read rest of the data in the doc but not the comment added by 2 or 3.If 3 allows then only 1 can read comments added by 2 & 3.
My problem s even if I hide the field when 1 goes to doc properties the hidden fields will also be visible.

I thought of encryption of the fields as a way but that would increase a lot of administrative overhead.
Can anybody suggest a way to stop the data from being seen in the document properties.
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

The best bet would be to to use encryption keys.  Cause the document property reveals everything even if you hide the fields.

Now, if its only edits then you could better use access controlled sections but...this is for read so, you gotta go for encryption keys.

Create  encryption keys and distribute it accordingly.
Create field named secret encryption keys field to populate the keys by the user accordingly. The best way to secure field data.

Good Luck!
Here is a tip.

Create additional form called "frmComments" (Response)
With fields, Comments (RichText), DocAuthors(Authors), DocReaders(Readers)

Whenever user enters a comment, use the frmComments and stamp DocAuthors and DocReaders with appropriate usernames.Mostly DocAuthors will be the current user and DocReaders would be the next user who has to read the comment.

So in total for each Main document, there will be 3 frmComments form as response.

Advantage, no need to maintain encryption keys. But still control the access to the data by using readers field.

If you need more details let me know.

sampaAuthor Commented:
Sorry folks for wasting ur precious time but got some info to give.When u make an .ntf of ur db and then create another db and replace the design with the existing .ntf, then the document properties are not visible.
But while replacing design the lotus script & formulas have to be unchecked.

Thanks for the help.
Both Hemanth & Arunkumar ur suggestions have been helpful for me.
Cloud Class® Course: CompTIA Healthcare IT Tech

This course will help prep you to earn the CompTIA Healthcare IT Technician certification showing that you have the knowledge and skills needed to succeed in installing, managing, and troubleshooting IT systems in medical and clinical settings.

You are right.  The fields wont be visible if you hide design from users...

But still you can write a lotusscript on the document to extract the field name and its values clearly if you dont encrypt the field content !!!

Just saving my comments you see!

Glad that you found a solution.

I don't know about the policy of your company. But most of the companies do not encourage the use of Hiding design. If your client allows then no one is stopping you from doing that.

Here in this forum, check how many people wanted a solution for getting back design which was hidden by this method. In R4, there was a back door so everyone got through it, in R5... you have to live with that.

So use it cautiously !!!
sampaAuthor Commented:
Yah u r right Hemanth.It's not for my company but for a project I am working on.
Actually the client wants the code also.We r going to put forward all solutions n they will decide what is the best way they want to work around it.
I too think encryption is the best way to work around it.If that is not accepted the .nsf and .ntf will be given for them to go across the same process which I did.
Good luck then !
You have open questions dating back to the year 2000.  ADMINISTRATION WILL BE CONTACTING YOU SHORTLY.  Moderators Computer101 or Netminder will return to finalize these if they are still open in 14 days.  Experts, please post closing recommendations before that time.

Below are your open questions as of today.  Questions which have been inactive for 21 days or longer are considered to be abandoned and for those, your options are:
1. Accept a Comment As Answer (use the button next to the Expert's name).
2. Close the question if the information was not useful to you, but may help others. You must tell the participants why you wish to do this, and allow for Expert response.  This choice will include a refund to you, and will move this question to our PAQ (Previously Asked Question) database.  If you found information outside this question thread, please add it.
3. Ask Community Support to help split points between participating experts, or just comment here with details and we'll respond with the process.
4. Delete the question (if it has no potential value for others).
   --> Post comments for expert of your intention to delete and why
   --> YOU CANNOT DELETE A QUESTION with comments; special handling by a Moderator is required.

For special handling needs, please post a zero point question in the link below and include the URL (question QID/link) that it regards with details.
Please click this link for Help Desk, Guidelines/Member Agreement and the Question/Answer process.

Click you Member Profile to view your question history and please keep them updated. If you are a KnowledgePro user, use the Power Search option to find them.  

Questions which are LOCKED with a Proposed Answer but do not help you, should be rejected with comments added.  When you grade the question less than an A, please comment as to why.  This helps all involved, as well as others who may access this item in the future.  PLEASE DO NOT AWARD POINTS TO ME.

To view your open questions, please click the following link(s) and keep them all current with updates.

To view your locked questions, please click the following link(s) and evaluate the proposed answer.

*****  E X P E R T S    P L E A S E  ******  Leave your closing recommendations.
If you are interested in the cleanup effort, please click this link 
POINTS FOR EXPERTS awaiting comments are listed in the link below
Moderators will finalize this question if in @14 days Asker has not responded.  This will be moved to the PAQ (Previously Asked Questions) at zero points, deleted or awarded.
Thanks everyone.
Moderator @ Experts Exchange
sampaAuthor Commented:
I have found answer to my question so I would like the question to be a PAQ.
sampaAuthor Commented:
The answer to this question has been submitted as a comment by myself.
I would like my points to be refunded.
Thanks, sampa, for adding the solution you found.  I have refunded your 100 points to you and closed this by moving it to our PAQ at zero points.
Moondancer - EE Moderator

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Lotus IBM

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.