PCassimans
asked on
Bandwidth Managment with Cisco 2600
Hi,
is it possible to do a sort of bandwidth management on a cisco 2600 router?
Let me explain. I have 2 host behind a 2600 router (connected via the ethernet adaptor). The other side of the router is a WAN link serial leased line (128k).
Is it possible to let ftp traffic to one host with a bandwidth limitation of 80k and the other host 48k of maximum ftp traffic.
Hope you understand what i mean :)
Kind regards
PCassimans
is it possible to do a sort of bandwidth management on a cisco 2600 router?
Let me explain. I have 2 host behind a 2600 router (connected via the ethernet adaptor). The other side of the router is a WAN link serial leased line (128k).
Is it possible to let ftp traffic to one host with a bandwidth limitation of 80k and the other host 48k of maximum ftp traffic.
Hope you understand what i mean :)
Kind regards
PCassimans
ASKER
Hi thx for the fast reply.
In the cisco document they say the following:
"It is only supported on generic routing encapsulation (GRE) tunnel interfaces"
Do i have to do something special for that?
It is not supported on ISDN. (i don't need it right now, but in the future maybe). Is there an other way to do it on ISDN?
Pierre
In the cisco document they say the following:
"It is only supported on generic routing encapsulation (GRE) tunnel interfaces"
Do i have to do something special for that?
It is not supported on ISDN. (i don't need it right now, but in the future maybe). Is there an other way to do it on ISDN?
Pierre
Since u say u have two hosts connected to the router , u can very well define the bandwidth at the WAN port & ethernet port using BANDWIDTH command respectively . It should work well. Traffic shaping is also when u hv too many hosts on the subnet & thereby control the BW for every IP.
Regards,
Kias
Regards,
Kias
ASKER
hmkias,
Can you give me an example of what you
propose to do?
thx
PS:please don't post answers but only comments, otherwise the question is locked for comment from other experts!
Can you give me an example of what you
propose to do?
thx
PS:please don't post answers but only comments, otherwise the question is locked for comment from other experts!
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
lrmoore
IOS 12.1 ip feature pack.
I'll have a test with traffic shaping over isdn, and if it works i'll accept your answer with pleasure :)
IOS 12.1 ip feature pack.
I'll have a test with traffic shaping over isdn, and if it works i'll accept your answer with pleasure :)
You still put the traffic shaping on the internal Ethernet interface to limit the traffic from that interface across the WAN regardless of whether or not the WAN interface is ISDN, PPP, frame-relay, whatever..
ASKER
ASKER
ASKER
This question appears to be abandoned. I will allow one week before I close this question
with the following recommendation:
- points to lrmoore
if there is any objection to this recommendation then please post it here within 7 days.
thanks,
lrmoore@nw
EE Cleanup Volunteer
per recommendation
SpideyMod
Community Support Moderator @Experts Exchange
SpideyMod
Community Support Moderator @Experts Exchange
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/qos_c/qcprt4/qcdgts.htm
example:
access-list 101 permit host <host1 IP> any eq ftp
access-list 102 permit host <host2 IP> any eq ftp
interface ether 0/0
traffic-shape group 101 80000
traffic-shape group 102 48000