Solved

RPC via VPN & Nat

Posted on 2002-05-02
10
458 Views
Last Modified: 2010-05-18
Hi
I have a dcom on a server in our internal network that is called from clients that access our network via GPRS thru a VPN, the component gets called ok.. but when it comes to make an RPC (remote procedure call) the components throws an out of memory error (some microsoft guy said that the system account is Not in the ACL(!?))
is it possible or not to run an RPC thru a VPN? we use cisco based vpn.. if yes can i have some white papers.. links or anything to base on.. (there are 2 pix firewalls between the client and the dcom host but VPN should tunel thru them) btw.. all the possible ports are open (135 + higher ports)

rgrds
0
Comment
Question by:Silvers5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • +1
10 Comments
 
LVL 79

Accepted Solution

by:
lrmoore earned 500 total points
ID: 6990792
I see no reason that the RPC calls will not pass through a properly configured IPSEC VPN tunnel.
You say you are using a Cisco based VPN, with two PIX firewalls between the client and host, but you did not specify if the VPN as PIX-to-PIX, router-to-PIX or router-to-router. We need to know the exact termination points of the VPNS if you have:

client -- PIX --- Router --Internet-- router -- PIX -- host

Typically, all IP traffic is configured to pass through the tunnel. If the RPC calls use TCP, then you should not have a problem if the VPN is from PIX to PIX. I would need the PIX software version to know which links to post for VPN setup.

http://www.microsoft.com/com/wpaper/dcomfw.asp
0
 
LVL 79

Expert Comment

by:lrmoore
ID: 6990797
Also need to know if your DCOM server is NT 4.0 or Window 2000...

If you have it setup to use UDP, then UDP broadcasts may not be forwarded across the VPN without specific configurations...
0
 
LVL 20

Author Comment

by:Silvers5
ID: 7036750
client .. router .. pix ..<i don't know if there's a router here>..pix.. router.. server
Using windows 2000 on the server and NT 4 on the client..
after further investigations The issue seems in the IP packet size, The ip packet size is by default 1500 bytes,
it's being dropped on the router and not fragmented.. tried to minimise the packet size to 1400 byte (from registry on server) but it didn't work.. (minimised the packet size on client too)
0
Netscaler Common Configuration How To guides

If you use NetScaler you will want to see these guides. The NetScaler How To Guides show administrators how to get NetScaler up and configured by providing instructions for common scenarios and some not so common ones.

 
LVL 79

Expert Comment

by:lrmoore
ID: 7037182
The PIX firewall needs to allow ICMP unreachables and Packet-too-big messages for path-mtu-discovery to work properly. The router default mtu is 1500 also, so that should not be a problem.
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:t1n0m3n
ID: 7063990
for RPC to work, you need portmapper open also...
port 111 udp
opent only port 111 and 1024+ and see if that works.
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:The--Captain
ID: 7075003
You're letting VPN clients do RPC with you?  You're either really brave, or really dumb (you *are* aware of the numerous security holes present in most RPC implementations, yes?).  Please don't make the all-too-common mistake of trusting your VPN users (I could preach all day about that)...

In any case, if you insist:

lrmoore is correct about mtu, if your network will pass (and your clients will listen to) pmtu messages.  You might just want to set your MTU lower, manually, in case pmtu is broken somewhere...

BTW, this *does* work for non-VPN users, yes?  If not, we need to re-evaluate the situation.

Cheers,
-Jon

P.S.  To answer your original question - yes, it is possible, as is any IP-based communication protocol.  You just have to know how to configure your systems properly.





0
 
LVL 20

Author Comment

by:Silvers5
ID: 7090242
>You're either really brave, or really dumb ..

we are a mobile operator .. we have some partners that use gprs technology we want to access our server.. it's sort of let's say a wan.. where we will use vpn over it for more security..
the machines we installed on our partner side are fully controlled by us.. the users have limited privilieges on the machines (they don't have admin access.. they can only run 1 specific application).. no input hardware (floppies cd's and the case is sealed..
0
 
LVL 79

Expert Comment

by:lrmoore
ID: 7871984
No comment has been added lately, so it's time to clean up this TA.
I will leave a recommendation in the Cleanup topic area that this question:

I recommend: moderator support

if there is any objection or other expert commentary to this recommendation then please post in here within 7 days.
If you feel that your question was not properly addressed, or that none of the comments received were appropriate answers, please post a request in Community support (with a link to this page) to refund your points. http://www.experts-exchange.com/Community_Support/

PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER!

thanks,
lrmoore
EE Cleanup Volunteer
---------------------
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:The--Captain
ID: 7873259
I don't know what I recommend - this was clearly in my court, but I must assume I never received an email notif, as the question died.

I suppose we sould see how the original poster wishes to proceed, if he's still around - he had scads of expert pts (makes mine looks pathetic), and might still be active.

Otherwise, I guess I recommend delete - let's leeave this one open a bit longer though, eh?

Cheers,
-Jon
0
 
LVL 20

Author Comment

by:Silvers5
ID: 7917482
hmm.. unfortunately the issue was related to the component security model.. where we had to disable component authentication.. I see lmoore have tryied to solve the issue in a rational way..

sorry for the delay
0

Featured Post

Live: Real-Time Solutions, Start Here

Receive instant 1:1 support from technology experts, using our real-time conversation and whiteboard interface. Your first 5 minutes are always free.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Cisco VPN Client and Windows 10 9 122
cradle point vpn to sonicwall 5 76
Trouble with VPN DENY rules on sonicwall 1 34
ASA Tunnel 18 29
This is an article about my experiences with remote access to my clients (so that I may serve them) and eventually to my home office system via Radmin Remote Control. I have been using remote access for over 10 years and have been improving my metho…
I recently attended Cisco Live! in Las Vegas, a conference that boasted over 28,000 techies in attendance, and a week of hands-on learning hosted by a solid partner with which Concerto goes to market.  Every year, Cisco displays cutting-edge technol…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
Windows 10 is mostly good. However the one thing that annoys me is how many clicks you have to do to dial a VPN connection. You have to go to settings from the start menu, (2 clicks), Network and Internet (1 click), Click VPN (another click) then fi…

786 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question