Solved

Simple question about ++ and --

Posted on 2002-05-07
12
181 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-02
The question is

what is the answer of the following code

int x,n=5;
x=++n*--n
cout << x;


the problem is I solved this code manually and got 30
but if I use VC++, it said 25!

Why? my friend said they use c on AX machine, the answer is 30.

please tell me about this...
I am confusing
0
Comment
Question by:StingRaY
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
12 Comments
 
LVL 16

Accepted Solution

by:
AlexNek earned 50 total points
ID: 6994649
2 StingRaY
AFIAK: ++ and -- has highest priority as *.
1. n = n+1  // n = 6
2. n = n-1  // n = 5
3. x = n*n  // x = 5*5 = 25
0
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:pagladasu
ID: 6994664
An expression like
++n*--n is bound to have side effects. The actual interpretation will vary from compiler to compiler. So you are getting different results.
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Axter
ID: 6994705
AlexNek,
The last line in your answer is incorrect.
It should equal to 30.
If VC++ is comming up with 25, then it's a compiler bug.

3. x = n*n  // x = 6*5 = 30
0
Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Axter
ID: 6994712
To prove it's a compiler bug, run the following code:

int SendNumBack(int n)
{
     return n;
}
     
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
     int x,n=5, n2=5, n3=6;
     x = (++n) * (--n);
     std::cout << "x = " << x << std::endl;
     
     x = SendNumBack(++n) * SendNumBack(--n);
     std::cout << "x = "  << x << std::endl;
     
     system("pause");
     return 0;
}

If the compiler is working properly,  both values will be the same.
You'll notice that VC++ returns two different values.
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:AlexNek
ID: 6995137
2 Axter
I'm sorry but I not agree with you. It is not a compiler error.
The first sample in your code working as I described above, the second use temporary storage.

1. Register X1 = n+1  // n = 6
2. Register X2 = n-1  // n = 5
3. x = Register X1*Register X2  // x = 6*5 = 30

0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Axter
ID: 6995159
AlexNek,
What do you think the first example should produce?
x = (++n) * (--n);

That should produce 30, but in VC++, the output is 25.
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Axter
ID: 6995167
AlexNek,
>>The first sample in your code working as I described
>>above, the second use temporary storage.

Both examples should produce the same value in a correctly working compiler.

The first example should equal to the following:
x = (++n) * (--n);
1. (++n) = n+1  // n = 6
2. (--n) = n-1  // n = 5
3. x = (++n)*(--n); // x = 6*5 = 30

And as you have already posted, the second example should also result in a 30.

However, in VC++, the first output is 25, and the second is 30.

This is a bug in the compiler.
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:AlexNek
ID: 6995173
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:AlexNek
ID: 6995188
2 Axter
show me compiler error here, please.

10:   int x,n=5;
   mov         [n],5
11:   x=++n*--n;
   mov         eax,[n]
   add         eax,1
   mov         [n],eax
   mov         ecx, [n]
   sub         ecx,1
   mov         [n],ecx
   mov         edx,[n]
   imul        edx,[n]
   mov         [x],edx
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Axter
ID: 6995268
AlexNek,
Since it's been decades since I last programmed in assembly language, the above comment has little meaning. :-)

The link you posted seems to support your view point, but it seems to be talking about what order the evaluation should take place in.

1. (++n) = n+1  // n = 6
2. (--n) = n-1  // n = 5
3. x = (++n)*(--n); // x = 6*5 = 30

OR

1. (--n) = n-1  // n = 4
2. (++n) = n+1  // n = 5
3. x = (++n)*(--n); // x = 5*4 = 20

No matter which order it goes in, the value still would not be 25.
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:AlexNek
ID: 6995288
2 Axter
>The link you posted seems to support your view point,
give me link which support your view point, please.

Why you think that left operand in N3 still 5 or 4?

x = current value of N * current value of N
and current value of N in both cases = 5
0
 
LVL 15

Author Comment

by:StingRaY
ID: 6996798
Thanks AlexNek and Axter.

I am wondering that

when an expression ++n*--n is performed,
where n is stored in memory.

the problem is where should the result of "++n" be kept when ++n is perform.

if result of ++n is stored in the same location of n
n should be updated to 6.

and the same reason --n will change that value to 5

after that VC++ will use that value for multiplication.

I don't know is it correct or not.


please describe.
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Article by: SunnyDark
This article's goal is to present you with an easy to use XML wrapper for C++ and also present some interesting techniques that you might use with MS C++. The reason I built this class is to ease the pain of using XML files with C++, since there is…
In days of old, returning something by value from a function in C++ was necessarily avoided because it would, invariably, involve one or even two copies of the object being created and potentially costly calls to a copy-constructor and destructor. A…
The viewer will learn how to use the return statement in functions in C++. The video will also teach the user how to pass data to a function and have the function return data back for further processing.
The viewer will learn additional member functions of the vector class. Specifically, the capacity and swap member functions will be introduced.

739 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question