Solved

Simple question about ++ and --

Posted on 2002-05-07
12
179 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-02
The question is

what is the answer of the following code

int x,n=5;
x=++n*--n
cout << x;


the problem is I solved this code manually and got 30
but if I use VC++, it said 25!

Why? my friend said they use c on AX machine, the answer is 30.

please tell me about this...
I am confusing
0
Comment
Question by:StingRaY
12 Comments
 
LVL 16

Accepted Solution

by:
AlexNek earned 50 total points
ID: 6994649
2 StingRaY
AFIAK: ++ and -- has highest priority as *.
1. n = n+1  // n = 6
2. n = n-1  // n = 5
3. x = n*n  // x = 5*5 = 25
0
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:pagladasu
ID: 6994664
An expression like
++n*--n is bound to have side effects. The actual interpretation will vary from compiler to compiler. So you are getting different results.
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Axter
ID: 6994705
AlexNek,
The last line in your answer is incorrect.
It should equal to 30.
If VC++ is comming up with 25, then it's a compiler bug.

3. x = n*n  // x = 6*5 = 30
0
Free Tool: ZipGrep

ZipGrep is a utility that can list and search zip (.war, .ear, .jar, etc) archives for text patterns, without the need to extract the archive's contents.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way to say thank you for being a part of the community.

 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Axter
ID: 6994712
To prove it's a compiler bug, run the following code:

int SendNumBack(int n)
{
     return n;
}
     
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
     int x,n=5, n2=5, n3=6;
     x = (++n) * (--n);
     std::cout << "x = " << x << std::endl;
     
     x = SendNumBack(++n) * SendNumBack(--n);
     std::cout << "x = "  << x << std::endl;
     
     system("pause");
     return 0;
}

If the compiler is working properly,  both values will be the same.
You'll notice that VC++ returns two different values.
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:AlexNek
ID: 6995137
2 Axter
I'm sorry but I not agree with you. It is not a compiler error.
The first sample in your code working as I described above, the second use temporary storage.

1. Register X1 = n+1  // n = 6
2. Register X2 = n-1  // n = 5
3. x = Register X1*Register X2  // x = 6*5 = 30

0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Axter
ID: 6995159
AlexNek,
What do you think the first example should produce?
x = (++n) * (--n);

That should produce 30, but in VC++, the output is 25.
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Axter
ID: 6995167
AlexNek,
>>The first sample in your code working as I described
>>above, the second use temporary storage.

Both examples should produce the same value in a correctly working compiler.

The first example should equal to the following:
x = (++n) * (--n);
1. (++n) = n+1  // n = 6
2. (--n) = n-1  // n = 5
3. x = (++n)*(--n); // x = 6*5 = 30

And as you have already posted, the second example should also result in a 30.

However, in VC++, the first output is 25, and the second is 30.

This is a bug in the compiler.
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:AlexNek
ID: 6995173
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:AlexNek
ID: 6995188
2 Axter
show me compiler error here, please.

10:   int x,n=5;
   mov         [n],5
11:   x=++n*--n;
   mov         eax,[n]
   add         eax,1
   mov         [n],eax
   mov         ecx, [n]
   sub         ecx,1
   mov         [n],ecx
   mov         edx,[n]
   imul        edx,[n]
   mov         [x],edx
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Axter
ID: 6995268
AlexNek,
Since it's been decades since I last programmed in assembly language, the above comment has little meaning. :-)

The link you posted seems to support your view point, but it seems to be talking about what order the evaluation should take place in.

1. (++n) = n+1  // n = 6
2. (--n) = n-1  // n = 5
3. x = (++n)*(--n); // x = 6*5 = 30

OR

1. (--n) = n-1  // n = 4
2. (++n) = n+1  // n = 5
3. x = (++n)*(--n); // x = 5*4 = 20

No matter which order it goes in, the value still would not be 25.
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:AlexNek
ID: 6995288
2 Axter
>The link you posted seems to support your view point,
give me link which support your view point, please.

Why you think that left operand in N3 still 5 or 4?

x = current value of N * current value of N
and current value of N in both cases = 5
0
 
LVL 15

Author Comment

by:StingRaY
ID: 6996798
Thanks AlexNek and Axter.

I am wondering that

when an expression ++n*--n is performed,
where n is stored in memory.

the problem is where should the result of "++n" be kept when ++n is perform.

if result of ++n is stored in the same location of n
n should be updated to 6.

and the same reason --n will change that value to 5

after that VC++ will use that value for multiplication.

I don't know is it correct or not.


please describe.
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Port Scanner

Check which ports are open to the outside world. Helps make sure that your firewall rules are working as intended.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article will show you some of the more useful Standard Template Library (STL) algorithms through the use of working examples.  You will learn about how these algorithms fit into the STL architecture, how they work with STL containers, and why t…
C++ Properties One feature missing from standard C++ that you will find in many other Object Oriented Programming languages is something called a Property (http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Languages/CPP/A_3912-Object-Properties-in-C.ht…
The goal of the video will be to teach the user the difference and consequence of passing data by value vs passing data by reference in C++. An example of passing data by value as well as an example of passing data by reference will be be given. Bot…
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.

829 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question