?
Solved

Why doesn't the compiler see overloaded base class functions?

Posted on 2002-05-15
7
Medium Priority
?
199 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-02
Why doesn't the compiler see overloaded base class functions? I cannot explain why the follwing is an error:

    #include <string>
    #include <iostream>
    using namespace std;

    class Base
    {
      public:
        virtual void Do( const string& )
        {
          cout << "Base::Do( string )" << endl;
        }
        virtual void Do( const char* const data,
                                  const long length )
        {
          cout << "Base::Do( char*, long )" << endl;
        }
    };

    class Derived : public Base
    {
      public:
        virtual void Do( const int s )
        {
          cout << "Base::Do( int )" << endl;
        }
    };

    int main(int argc, char* argv[])
    {
      Derived d;
      d.Do( 5 );
      d.Do( string() );
      d.Do( "foobar", 6 );
      return 0;
    }

Why doesn't the compiler "see" the base class versions of Do()? The only way I can get this to compile is to qualify the calls by adding "Base::", like so:

    d.Base::Do( string() );
    d.Base::Do( "foobar", 6 );

Can someone explain to me why this is the case? Thanks!
0
Comment
Question by:magenta
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
7 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:magenta
ID: 7012178
I should have pointed out that the compiler complains about the following lines:

     d.Do( string() );
     d.Do( "foobar", 6 );

It seems to only see the Derived methods.
0
 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
thienpnguyen earned 200 total points
ID: 7012402
In subclass, if you have a overload funtion that is same name with a fucntion in base class, then that function in base class will be hide .

0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:thienpnguyen
ID: 7012417
For fixing the bug, you can do as following

class Derived : public Base
{
public:

    using  Base::Do; // <-------- new code

    virtual void Do( const int s )
    {
      cout << "Base::Do( int )" << endl;
    }

};

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
  Derived d;
  d.Do( 5 );
  d.Do( string() );
  d.Do( "foobar", 6 );
  return 0;
}
0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:thienpnguyen
ID: 7012427
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:MDarling
ID: 7012450
This is not meant to trample on thienpnguyen's answer.

Just thought I'd post the full listing as I got it to compile on M$ VC6.0.

Nice links Thien! Almost perfect for this question.




#include <string>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

class Base
{
public:
     virtual void Do( const string& )
     {
          cout << "Base::Do( string )" << endl;
     }
     virtual void Do( const char* const data,
          const long length )
     {
          cout << "Base::Do( char*, long )" << endl;
     }
};

class Derived : public Base
{
public:
     
     Base::Do;
     
     virtual void Do( const int s )
     {
          cout << "Base::Do( int )" << endl;
     }
};

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
     Derived d;
     d.Do( 5 );
     d.Do( string() );
     d.Do( "foobar", 6 );
     return 0;
}
0
 

Author Comment

by:magenta
ID: 7012541
Very intesting...I'm going to have to sit down and read that article. I should probably have the C++ standard nearby...

However, before I do that, answer this question. If a derived class by definition can be treated the same as a base class, then isn't the code above example of this rule being broken?
0
 
LVL 11

Expert Comment

by:griessh
ID: 7178762
Dear magenta

I think you forgot this question. I will ask Community Support to close it unless you finalize it within 7 days. You can always request to keep this question open. But remember, experts can only help you if you provide feedback to their questions.
Unless there is objection or further activity,  I will suggest to accept

     "thienpnguyen"

comment(s) as an answer.
     "refund the points and delete this question"
since nobody had a satisfying answer for you.
since you never gave more feedback.
PAQ at zero points.

If you think your question was not answered at all, you can post a request in Community support (please include this link) to refund your points. The link to the Community Support area is: http://www.experts-exchange.com/commspt/


PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER!
======
Werner
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Article by: SunnyDark
This article's goal is to present you with an easy to use XML wrapper for C++ and also present some interesting techniques that you might use with MS C++. The reason I built this class is to ease the pain of using XML files with C++, since there is…
Container Orchestration platforms empower organizations to scale their apps at an exceptional rate. This is the reason numerous innovation-driven companies are moving apps to an appropriated datacenter wide platform that empowers them to scale at a …
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.
The viewer will learn additional member functions of the vector class. Specifically, the capacity and swap member functions will be introduced.
Suggested Courses

801 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question