Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 207
  • Last Modified:

Why doesn't the compiler see overloaded base class functions?

Why doesn't the compiler see overloaded base class functions? I cannot explain why the follwing is an error:

    #include <string>
    #include <iostream>
    using namespace std;

    class Base
    {
      public:
        virtual void Do( const string& )
        {
          cout << "Base::Do( string )" << endl;
        }
        virtual void Do( const char* const data,
                                  const long length )
        {
          cout << "Base::Do( char*, long )" << endl;
        }
    };

    class Derived : public Base
    {
      public:
        virtual void Do( const int s )
        {
          cout << "Base::Do( int )" << endl;
        }
    };

    int main(int argc, char* argv[])
    {
      Derived d;
      d.Do( 5 );
      d.Do( string() );
      d.Do( "foobar", 6 );
      return 0;
    }

Why doesn't the compiler "see" the base class versions of Do()? The only way I can get this to compile is to qualify the calls by adding "Base::", like so:

    d.Base::Do( string() );
    d.Base::Do( "foobar", 6 );

Can someone explain to me why this is the case? Thanks!
0
magenta
Asked:
magenta
1 Solution
 
magentaAuthor Commented:
I should have pointed out that the compiler complains about the following lines:

     d.Do( string() );
     d.Do( "foobar", 6 );

It seems to only see the Derived methods.
0
 
thienpnguyenCommented:
In subclass, if you have a overload funtion that is same name with a fucntion in base class, then that function in base class will be hide .

0
 
thienpnguyenCommented:
For fixing the bug, you can do as following

class Derived : public Base
{
public:

    using  Base::Do; // <-------- new code

    virtual void Do( const int s )
    {
      cout << "Base::Do( int )" << endl;
    }

};

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
  Derived d;
  d.Do( 5 );
  d.Do( string() );
  d.Do( "foobar", 6 );
  return 0;
}
0
Get your problem seen by more experts

Be seen. Boost your question’s priority for more expert views and faster solutions

 
thienpnguyenCommented:
0
 
MDarlingCommented:
This is not meant to trample on thienpnguyen's answer.

Just thought I'd post the full listing as I got it to compile on M$ VC6.0.

Nice links Thien! Almost perfect for this question.




#include <string>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

class Base
{
public:
     virtual void Do( const string& )
     {
          cout << "Base::Do( string )" << endl;
     }
     virtual void Do( const char* const data,
          const long length )
     {
          cout << "Base::Do( char*, long )" << endl;
     }
};

class Derived : public Base
{
public:
     
     Base::Do;
     
     virtual void Do( const int s )
     {
          cout << "Base::Do( int )" << endl;
     }
};

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
     Derived d;
     d.Do( 5 );
     d.Do( string() );
     d.Do( "foobar", 6 );
     return 0;
}
0
 
magentaAuthor Commented:
Very intesting...I'm going to have to sit down and read that article. I should probably have the C++ standard nearby...

However, before I do that, answer this question. If a derived class by definition can be treated the same as a base class, then isn't the code above example of this rule being broken?
0
 
griesshCommented:
Dear magenta

I think you forgot this question. I will ask Community Support to close it unless you finalize it within 7 days. You can always request to keep this question open. But remember, experts can only help you if you provide feedback to their questions.
Unless there is objection or further activity,  I will suggest to accept

     "thienpnguyen"

comment(s) as an answer.
     "refund the points and delete this question"
since nobody had a satisfying answer for you.
since you never gave more feedback.
PAQ at zero points.

If you think your question was not answered at all, you can post a request in Community support (please include this link) to refund your points. The link to the Community Support area is: http://www.experts-exchange.com/commspt/


PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER!
======
Werner
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

The 14th Annual Expert Award Winners

The results are in! Meet the top members of our 2017 Expert Awards. Congratulations to all who qualified!

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now