• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 196
  • Last Modified:

abnormal closing sql connection

I have many processes connect to SQL server(host pc) and there are running at the backend all the time. If i try to terminate the process abnomally(eg : Shutdown pc), but the connection to SQL server is still alive. The connection is not close properly. If the process restart again, it will create another new connection. The maximum connection to sql server is set to 100 , So if the connection is more than 100, error will occur. My question is how can I handle the SQL connection so that the process termination will close the SQL connection properly?
0
chencc77
Asked:
chencc77
1 Solution
 
objectsCommented:
I'm not sure if there is anything you can do to close them automatically, you can just do your best to ensure that you close them before exitting the app. But for example if someone pulls the plug on the PC then there's not much you can do.
Setting a timeout on the server is probably the best you can do.
0
 
chencc77Author Commented:
My application is a scheduler, so it maybe sleep for a long time when there is no job to be executed. If i set the timeout for it, the server would stop the scheduler. So how server determine the connection is still activate.
0
 
objectsCommented:
I'm talking about the server timing out the JDBC connection. If your apps not using a connection for long periods of time it shouldn't really be keeping a connection open, especially if you're concerned about having too many connections open.
0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 
chencc77Author Commented:
i am using java.sql class, i am not sure how to set the timing out properties.
0
 
objectsCommented:
The timeout is setup on the server, not the client.
0
 
chencc77Author Commented:
DO Timeout in server will solve the problem? How long the timeout will be set? if the scheduler only live once in a day, would timeout is usable?
0
 
CEHJCommented:
As objects says, the only way you could justify keeping an open connection for a scheduler is if its schedules were very frequent. Otherwise, you should open a connection when its schedule is due. In SQL Server 2000 there are the 'Connection Timeout' and 'Query Timeout' configuration settings. By default, these are set to 0, i.e. no timeouts. You could change one or other of these if necessary.
0
 
objectsCommented:
> DO Timeout in server will solve the problem?

They'll provide the best solution I can think of.
(I use them for exactly the same problem).

> How long the timeout will be set?

A little longer than the maximum time a JDBC connection will be left idle by the client.

> if the scheduler only live once in a day, would timeout is usable?

Does the scheduler keep a JDBC connection open all the time?
If you're concerned about how many connections are open, then I'd recomend that it doesn't, and only opens one when needed.
0
 
chencc77Author Commented:
>Does the scheduler keep a JDBC connection open all the time?
Yes

The app does open only one connection when it is started. The problem is if the app is stop abnormally (without using closeConnection), then the connection is still alive. So the number of connection is not reduce if app is terminate abnormally.

Is there any method to test the connection is still activate?
0
 
objectsCommented:
> Is there any method to test the connection is still activate?

On the server?? What is going to test it?
Not that I know of, and would depend on the db.


Holding a connection open indefinitely is not a good idea considering the fact that you are concerned about the number of open connections. I'd recomend closing it when not required.
This would also solve your original problem.
0
 
chencc77Author Commented:
import java.sql.*;
import java.rmi.*;
import java.rmi.server.UnicastRemoteObject;
import java.text.*;

public class RmiJdbcImpl extends UnicastRemoteObject implements RmiJdbc {

       private RJConn jrc [] = new RJConn [100];
     
        public RmiJdbcImpl () throws RemoteException {
          super();
       }

        public int openConnection() throws RemoteException, SQLException, ClassNotFoundException {
               
                int connectionId;

          // Loop through connection table until an empty slot is found.
          for (connectionId = 0; connectionId < jrc.length; connectionId++) {
                        if (jrc[connectionId] == null)
                                break;
              }

          // If no empty slots found, generate an error.
          if (connectionId >= jrc.length) {
                        System.out.println("WARNING: No more connection objects available");
               return -1;
              }

          // Create a connection for the new process and run it.
          jrc[connectionId] = new RJConn();
          jrc[connectionId].openConnection();

          // Return the connection identifier.
          return connectionId;
        }


        public void closeConnection(int id) throws RemoteException, SQLException {
          jrc[id].closeConnection();
          jrc[id] = null;
        }


}
//END

RJCon is a JDBC connection class. i set the limit to 100. In RJCon include openConn and closeConn. The apps will call openConn once it is execute. If it is stop without calling closeConn. The connection is still count in the jrc Array.
0
 
chencc77Author Commented:
>I'd recomend closing it when not required.

how to determine the connection is not required if the app is closed abnormally?
0
 
objectsCommented:
> how to determine the connection is not required if the
> app is closed abnormally?

It will be timed out by the server.
0
 
objectsCommented:
BTW, you should check if you JDBC implementation provides connection pooling. Many these days do, so implementing connection pooling yourself is not necessary.
0
 
chencc77Author Commented:
Ok..thanks, i will try on it.
0
 
girionisCommented:
No comment has been added lately, so it's time to clean up this TA.

I will leave a recommendation in the Cleanup topic area that this question is:

- points to objects@idg

Please leave any comments here within the
next seven days.

PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER !

girionis
Cleanup Volunteer
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now