Solved

Packet loss via router

Posted on 2002-05-28
20
293 Views
Last Modified: 2010-03-18
Hi,
I have a network of about 40 computers. They are connected to the Inet via router,which is a Linux (Mandrake 8.3/iptables 1.2.5)box, connected to ADSL line with Alcatel SpeedTouch Home ADSL modem. When i try to connect something from the network, I get about 70% packet loss. From the router the line works decently (~2% packet loss).
 Please, help!!!
            L.
0
Comment
Question by:Leonid99
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 9
  • 4
  • 3
  • +2
20 Comments
 
LVL 51

Expert Comment

by:ahoffmann
ID: 7040004
either the driver, or the NIC, or the cable, or the hub/switch has a problem.
I'd start with exchanging the cable, then NIC ..
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Leonid99
ID: 7040929
Checked it, no data loss between router and computers inside the network. It's some weird mtu problem
0
 
LVL 51

Expert Comment

by:ahoffmann
ID: 7041232
did your router forget about window size settings?
Did you try to force set the mtu < 1500 on the NIC (not a good idea 'cause it affects LAN traffic too, but worth a try)
0
Free learning courses: Active Directory Deep Dive

Get a firm grasp on your IT environment when you learn Active Directory best practices with Veeam! Watch all, or choose any amount, of this three-part webinar series to improve your skills. From the basics to virtualization and backup, we got you covered.

 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:cincin77
ID: 7041451
Does the ping command also have packet loss?
As it uses 64 byte packets by default which has nothing to do with MTU? (also as it is an ICMP message nothing to do with MTU:)) )
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Leonid99
ID: 7041530
I check the data loss with 'ping -s 1400 x.x.x.x'
from router it does 0% packet loss, from the internal host it does 70%
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:cincin77
ID: 7041539
what about without the -s option?
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Leonid99
ID: 7041638
I check the data loss with 'ping -s 1400 x.x.x.x'
from router it does 0% packet loss, from the internal host it does 70%
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Leonid99
ID: 7041804
I check the data loss with 'ping -s 1400 x.x.x.x'
from router it does 0% packet loss, from the internal host it does 70%
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Leonid99
ID: 7041819
I check the data loss with 'ping -s 1400 x.x.x.x'
from router it does 0% packet loss, from the internal host it does 70%
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Leonid99
ID: 7043742
I check the data loss with 'ping -s 1400 x.x.x.x'
from router it does 0% packet loss, from the internal host it does 70%
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Leonid99
ID: 7043768
That's what bad connection, and computer left on overnight do :)
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:The--Captain
ID: 7043989
Have you tried playing with your MTU values?

Cheers,
-Jon
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:The--Captain
ID: 7043992
Probably not the problem, but just a thought...
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Leonid99
ID: 7044036
Yes, I did. It's not mtu -- the pings get lost even on small packet sizes
0
 
LVL 3

Accepted Solution

by:
cincin77 earned 300 total points
ID: 7044044
if you have w2k client try to use pathping command instead of ping, it will give you valuable information on the source of the loss(that is the links or the active devices?)
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Leonid99
ID: 7047727
it was routing problem with my ISP.
sorry for your time.
cinciny77, nice try, u get your points :))
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:The--Captain
ID: 7047936
Please tell us how you ISP explained 70% packet loss as "a routing problem" - this I gotta hear.

Thanks,
-Jon
0
 
LVL 51

Expert Comment

by:ahoffmann
ID: 7049778
.. I'm interested too ..
0
 
LVL 15

Expert Comment

by:samri
ID: 7072323
or maybe it's the carrier is the culprit.
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:The--Captain
ID: 7074062
Or maybe it's rabid backhoes - In any case, I wanna know.  leonid has some explaining to do, IMO...

Cheers,
-Jon
0

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Embeded Linux on Router 9 112
Linux CentOs 6.7 : i can't start service 8 103
iptables ubuntu BLOCK all 2 97
Master-Master-Slave BIND setup 2 77
I have seen several blogs and forum entries elsewhere state that because NTFS volumes do not support linux ownership or permissions, they cannot be used for anonymous ftp upload through the vsftpd program.   IT can be done and here's how to get i…
Note: for this to work properly you need to use a Cross-Over network cable. 1. Connect both servers S1 and S2 on the second network slots respectively. Note that you can use the 1st slots but usually these would be occupied by the Service Provide…
Nobody understands Phishing better than an anti-spam company. That’s why we are providing Phishing Awareness Training to our customers. According to a report by Verizon, only 3% of targeted users report malicious emails to management. With compan…
The Email Laundry PDF encryption service allows companies to send confidential encrypted  emails to anybody. The PDF document can also contain attachments that are embedded in the encrypted PDF. The password is randomly generated by The Email Laundr…

752 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question